兰州大学学报(自然科学版)
蘭州大學學報(自然科學版)
란주대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF LANZHOU UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCES)
2014年
2期
228-232
,共5页
孔令彬%仝纪龙%王聚杰%赵艳茹%张文煜
孔令彬%仝紀龍%王聚傑%趙豔茹%張文煜
공령빈%동기룡%왕취걸%조염여%장문욱
城市近地层%不同下垫面%湍流通量%对比分析
城市近地層%不同下墊麵%湍流通量%對比分析
성시근지층%불동하점면%단류통량%대비분석
urban surface layer%different underlying surface%turbulent flux%contrastive analysis
利用榆中县2011年10月2-15日外场实验的湍流观测资料,结合天气背景,对比分析了城市同一区域内不同下垫面的动量通量、感热通量、潜热通量和CO2通量的差异特征.结果表明:草地下垫面和混凝土下垫面之间动量通量的差异较小;混凝土下垫面的感热通量整体大于草地下垫面,且在日间差异较大,差异的最大值达109.29 W/m2;草地下垫面的潜热通量在日间明显大于混凝土下垫面,差异的最大值达153.8 W/m2,夜间两下垫面潜热通量差异较小;CO2通量在排放源附近较大.
利用榆中縣2011年10月2-15日外場實驗的湍流觀測資料,結閤天氣揹景,對比分析瞭城市同一區域內不同下墊麵的動量通量、感熱通量、潛熱通量和CO2通量的差異特徵.結果錶明:草地下墊麵和混凝土下墊麵之間動量通量的差異較小;混凝土下墊麵的感熱通量整體大于草地下墊麵,且在日間差異較大,差異的最大值達109.29 W/m2;草地下墊麵的潛熱通量在日間明顯大于混凝土下墊麵,差異的最大值達153.8 W/m2,夜間兩下墊麵潛熱通量差異較小;CO2通量在排放源附近較大.
이용유중현2011년10월2-15일외장실험적단류관측자료,결합천기배경,대비분석료성시동일구역내불동하점면적동량통량、감열통량、잠열통량화CO2통량적차이특정.결과표명:초지하점면화혼응토하점면지간동량통량적차이교소;혼응토하점면적감열통량정체대우초지하점면,차재일간차이교대,차이적최대치체109.29 W/m2;초지하점면적잠열통량재일간명현대우혼응토하점면,차이적최대치체153.8 W/m2,야간량하점면잠열통량차이교소;CO2통량재배방원부근교대.
With the turbulence observational data from the field experiment in Yuzhong County from October 2, 2011 to October 15, 2011, a contrastive analysis was made of the changing features of the momentum flux, the sensible heat flux, the latent heat flux and the CO2 flux in different underlying surfaces of the same area in a city by combining it with an analysis of the weather background. The results indicated that the difference in the momentum flux between the grassland underlying surface and the concrete underlying surface was relatively small;the sensible heat flux of the concrete underlying surface was greater than that of the grassland underlying surface, and it showed a large difference during the daytime;the maximum of the difference was 109.29 W/m2. The latent heat flux of the grassland underlying surface was obviously greater than that of the concrete underlying surface during the daytime, and the maximum of the difference was 153.8 W/m2. During the night, the difference between the two underlying surfaces was relatively small and the CO2 flux was comparatively large near the emission source.