中国海商法研究
中國海商法研究
중국해상법연구
Annual of China Maritime Law
2012年
2期
11-16
,共6页
《鹿特丹规则》%港口经营人%责任限制%海运履约方
《鹿特丹規則》%港口經營人%責任限製%海運履約方
《록특단규칙》%항구경영인%책임한제%해운리약방
Rotterdam Rules%port operators%liability limitation%maritime performing party
通过对中国港口经营人责任限制的分析以及对《鹿特丹规则》下海运履约方制度的解读，探讨非承运人委托作业时港口经营人责任界定。得出中国可以借鉴《鹿特丹规则》，通过完善《中华人民共和国海商法》实际承运入制度，使实际承运人适用于港口经营人，可以享有责任限制权，但仅限于消极抗辩权。
通過對中國港口經營人責任限製的分析以及對《鹿特丹規則》下海運履約方製度的解讀，探討非承運人委託作業時港口經營人責任界定。得齣中國可以藉鑒《鹿特丹規則》，通過完善《中華人民共和國海商法》實際承運入製度，使實際承運人適用于港口經營人，可以享有責任限製權，但僅限于消極抗辯權。
통과대중국항구경영인책임한제적분석이급대《록특단규칙》하해운리약방제도적해독，탐토비승운인위탁작업시항구경영인책임계정。득출중국가이차감《록특단규칙》，통과완선《중화인민공화국해상법》실제승운입제도，사실제승운인괄용우항구경영인，가이향유책임한제권，단부한우소겁항변권。
Based on the introduction of the definition of marine performing party as provided in the new convention of Rotterdam Rules, the paper held that port operators should be assigned as maritime performing party in the new convention under certain conditions. The paper made a deep and completed analysis of the impact of marine performing party system in the new convention on port operators, pointed out that the port operators should be entitled to the right of liability limitation on the basis of the actual carrier system as provided by the Maritime Code of the People＇s Republic of China but the right shall be confined only to negative right of defense.
