山西省政法管理干部学院学报
山西省政法管理榦部學院學報
산서성정법관리간부학원학보
JOURNAL OF SHANXI POLITICS AND LAW INSTITUTE FOR ADMINISTRATORS
2012年
3期
185-187
,共3页
渎职%受贿%罪数
瀆職%受賄%罪數
독직%수회%죄수
malfeasance%bribery%quantity of crime
目前,由于刑法对受贿型渎职犯罪在立法上的空白,给司法实践带来了困惑,不利于司法机关对受贿型渎职犯罪准确地定罪量刑。渎职行为与受贿行为之间并非牵连关系,两罪在犯罪构成上也非重合关系。对于渎职受贿罪应当以受贿罪和渎职罪数罪并罚论处,这种处断原则并不违背禁止重复评价原则,更能体现罪刑相适应原则。
目前,由于刑法對受賄型瀆職犯罪在立法上的空白,給司法實踐帶來瞭睏惑,不利于司法機關對受賄型瀆職犯罪準確地定罪量刑。瀆職行為與受賄行為之間併非牽連關繫,兩罪在犯罪構成上也非重閤關繫。對于瀆職受賄罪應噹以受賄罪和瀆職罪數罪併罰論處,這種處斷原則併不違揹禁止重複評價原則,更能體現罪刑相適應原則。
목전,유우형법대수회형독직범죄재입법상적공백,급사법실천대래료곤혹,불리우사법궤관대수회형독직범죄준학지정죄양형。독직행위여수회행위지간병비견련관계,량죄재범죄구성상야비중합관계。대우독직수회죄응당이수회죄화독직죄수죄병벌론처,저충처단원칙병불위배금지중복평개원칙,경능체현죄형상괄응원칙。
At present,that the blank in legislation on crimes of malfeasance and bribery from criminal law causes confusion to the judicial practice is not conducive to accurate conviction and sentencing of crimes of malfeasance and bribery for judicial organs.The relationship between malfeasance and bribery is not implicated relation and the two crimes are not in coincidence relations in the constitution of crime.Crimes of malfeasance and bribery should be punished combining bribery and malfeasance.This principle of punishment does not violate the principle of prohibiting repeatable evaluation and can better reflect the adaptation of crime and punishment.