山西省政法管理干部学院学报
山西省政法管理榦部學院學報
산서성정법관리간부학원학보
JOURNAL OF SHANXI POLITICS AND LAW INSTITUTE FOR ADMINISTRATORS
2012年
3期
162-164
,共3页
刑期折抵%同一行为%诉讼保障%重构
刑期摺牴%同一行為%訴訟保障%重構
형기절저%동일행위%소송보장%중구
sentence offsetting%same conduct%litigation security%reconstruction
在刑法理论中,对刑期折抵只是作为法律规定予以解读,而没有当作一项法律制度来把握。现行法律体系中,刑期折抵限定在先行羁押的范围,要求先行羁押与认定的犯罪事实基于"同一行为",该标准没有全面考虑刑法自由保障机能,不能实现刑期折抵的真正价值。对此,应对刑期折抵标准予以重构。
在刑法理論中,對刑期摺牴隻是作為法律規定予以解讀,而沒有噹作一項法律製度來把握。現行法律體繫中,刑期摺牴限定在先行羈押的範圍,要求先行羈押與認定的犯罪事實基于"同一行為",該標準沒有全麵攷慮刑法自由保障機能,不能實現刑期摺牴的真正價值。對此,應對刑期摺牴標準予以重構。
재형법이론중,대형기절저지시작위법률규정여이해독,이몰유당작일항법률제도래파악。현행법률체계중,형기절저한정재선행기압적범위,요구선행기압여인정적범죄사실기우"동일행위",해표준몰유전면고필형법자유보장궤능,불능실현형기절저적진정개치。대차,응대형기절저표준여이중구。
Criminal law theory just provides interpretation to sentence offsetting as legal provisions and does not take it as a legal system.In current legal system,sentence offsetting is limited in the range of first detention and requires that first detention and the facts of the crime being recognized should be based on the "same conduct".The standard does not take full account of protection function for freedom in criminal law and cannot realize the true value of sentence offsetting.Therefore,the standard of sentence offsetting should be reconstructed.