湖南农业大学学报：社会科学版
湖南農業大學學報：社會科學版
호남농업대학학보：사회과학판
Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Science)
2012年
4期
76-82
,共7页
《劝导》%柯勒律治%对话诗%主体%客体%第三方%交错配列
《勸導》%柯勒律治%對話詩%主體%客體%第三方%交錯配列
《권도》%가륵률치%대화시%주체%객체%제삼방%교착배렬
Persuasion%Coleridge%conversation poems%subject%object%third party%chiasmus
对奥斯丁小说《劝导》的内容、结构和行文策略等微观情境层面进行分析,并与柯勒律治浪漫主义对话诗比较表明：两者在主客体交融、主客体交融的中介即＂第三方＂以及承载主客体交融的交错配列结构三个方面的浪漫主义表现手法有着明显的共性。
對奧斯丁小說《勸導》的內容、結構和行文策略等微觀情境層麵進行分析,併與柯勒律治浪漫主義對話詩比較錶明：兩者在主客體交融、主客體交融的中介即＂第三方＂以及承載主客體交融的交錯配列結構三箇方麵的浪漫主義錶現手法有著明顯的共性。
대오사정소설《권도》적내용、결구화행문책략등미관정경층면진행분석,병여가륵률치랑만주의대화시비교표명：량자재주객체교융、주객체교융적중개즉＂제삼방＂이급승재주객체교융적교착배렬결구삼개방면적랑만주의표현수법유착명현적공성。
Comparing the analyses of Persuasion in the perspective of structure, textual and strategy and Coleridge＇s conversation poems, this paper finds that these two types of literature are similar in three categories： the fusion of subject and object, third party, which is the intermediary of subject and object, and chiasmus, which bears the fusion of subject and object, which shows that the novel of Persuasion also has distinctive features of romanticism.
