CAJ | 학술논문

许多学者认为司马迁提倡宏观经济管理的善因论,而否定国家干涉主义的轻重论。从司马迁对汉初盛世＂物盛而衰＂的历史记述可知,他对经济上的善因政策并非完全肯定。分析武帝政府实施轻重论的缘起及这种理论所带来的经济、政治实效,司马迁对轻重论是持赞同态度的。轻重论与善因论具有互补性,它是在特殊社会形势下采取的一种特殊政策。
허다학자인위사마천제창굉관경제관리적선인론,이부정국가간섭주의적경중론。종사마천대한초성세＂물성이쇠＂적역사기술가지,타대경제상적선인정책병비완전긍정。분석무제정부실시경중론적연기급저충이론소대래적경제、정치실효,사마천대경중론시지찬동태도적。경중론여선인론구유호보성,타시재특수사회형세하채취적일충특수정책。
It is believed that Sima Qian advocated the ＂Shanyin＂ theory in the macroeconomic management and denied the ＂Qingzhong＂ theory of state--led interventionist. We argue that he didn＇t approve of ＂ Shanyin＂ theory totally from the record of the Golden Age in the beginning of the Han dynasty. And also, we discover that he didn＇t deny the ＂Qingzhong＂ theory through analyzing the reasons that this theory was brought into practice and the economic and political results that this theory brought about. The ＂ Qingzhong＂ theory and ＂Shanyin＂ theory were complementary, and the ＂Qingzhong＂ theory, as a special policy, was taken under the special social situation.