国际麻醉学与复苏杂志
國際痳醉學與複囌雜誌
국제마취학여복소잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION
2014年
4期
320-323
,共4页
丙泊酚%人工流产术%情绪
丙泊酚%人工流產術%情緒
병박분%인공유산술%정서
Propofol%Artificial abortion%Mood
目的 探讨丙泊酚对无痛人工流产妇女麻醉苏醒后情绪的影响. 方法 将初次行无痛人工流产的未婚妇女120例采用随机数字表法随机分为2组,每组60例,分别采用丙泊酚(P组)和依托咪酯(E组)麻醉,两组均复合舒芬太尼.采用正性负性情绪量表(the positive and negative affect scale,PANAS)分别在术前和术后对人工流产妇女进行情绪评定.PANAS共20个形容词,其中描述正性情绪和负性情绪的各10项,每项有5个答案:几乎没有、比较少、中等程度、比较多和极其多,分别计1、2、3、4、5分.记录两组术后恶心呕吐、头晕、腹痛及梦幻的发生情况. 结果 两组的一般资料、意识消失时间、麻醉苏醒时间、手术时间、术前血压、心率、术前正性情绪、负性情绪比较差异无统计学意义.麻醉后P组与E组比较,血压[(74±12) mmHgvs (79±13) mmHg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)]和心率[(69±16)次/min vs (74±17)次/min]均降低(P<0.05).与术前比较:术后P组负性情绪评分[(31±7)分vs(24±9)分]和F组负性情绪评分[(30±8)分vs(25±7)分]均降低(P<0.05),P组正性情绪评分[(25±7)分vs (34±8)分]增高(P<0.05),E组正性情绪评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后头晕、恶心、腹痛的发生率两组比较差异无统计学意义;P组梦幻发生率(36.7%)高于E组(13.3%).麻醉满意度两组均达到100%. 结论 丙泊酚使得人工流产妇女术后更易表现出积极、热情等正性情绪,这种情绪变化与其起效快、苏醒快以及头晕、恶心发生率低无关.
目的 探討丙泊酚對無痛人工流產婦女痳醉囌醒後情緒的影響. 方法 將初次行無痛人工流產的未婚婦女120例採用隨機數字錶法隨機分為2組,每組60例,分彆採用丙泊酚(P組)和依託咪酯(E組)痳醉,兩組均複閤舒芬太尼.採用正性負性情緒量錶(the positive and negative affect scale,PANAS)分彆在術前和術後對人工流產婦女進行情緒評定.PANAS共20箇形容詞,其中描述正性情緒和負性情緒的各10項,每項有5箇答案:幾乎沒有、比較少、中等程度、比較多和極其多,分彆計1、2、3、4、5分.記錄兩組術後噁心嘔吐、頭暈、腹痛及夢幻的髮生情況. 結果 兩組的一般資料、意識消失時間、痳醉囌醒時間、手術時間、術前血壓、心率、術前正性情緒、負性情緒比較差異無統計學意義.痳醉後P組與E組比較,血壓[(74±12) mmHgvs (79±13) mmHg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)]和心率[(69±16)次/min vs (74±17)次/min]均降低(P<0.05).與術前比較:術後P組負性情緒評分[(31±7)分vs(24±9)分]和F組負性情緒評分[(30±8)分vs(25±7)分]均降低(P<0.05),P組正性情緒評分[(25±7)分vs (34±8)分]增高(P<0.05),E組正性情緒評分差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).術後頭暈、噁心、腹痛的髮生率兩組比較差異無統計學意義;P組夢幻髮生率(36.7%)高于E組(13.3%).痳醉滿意度兩組均達到100%. 結論 丙泊酚使得人工流產婦女術後更易錶現齣積極、熱情等正性情緒,這種情緒變化與其起效快、囌醒快以及頭暈、噁心髮生率低無關.
목적 탐토병박분대무통인공유산부녀마취소성후정서적영향. 방법 장초차행무통인공유산적미혼부녀120례채용수궤수자표법수궤분위2조,매조60례,분별채용병박분(P조)화의탁미지(E조)마취,량조균복합서분태니.채용정성부성정서량표(the positive and negative affect scale,PANAS)분별재술전화술후대인공유산부녀진행정서평정.PANAS공20개형용사,기중묘술정성정서화부성정서적각10항,매항유5개답안:궤호몰유、비교소、중등정도、비교다화겁기다,분별계1、2、3、4、5분.기록량조술후악심구토、두훈、복통급몽환적발생정황. 결과 량조적일반자료、의식소실시간、마취소성시간、수술시간、술전혈압、심솔、술전정성정서、부성정서비교차이무통계학의의.마취후P조여E조비교,혈압[(74±12) mmHgvs (79±13) mmHg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)]화심솔[(69±16)차/min vs (74±17)차/min]균강저(P<0.05).여술전비교:술후P조부성정서평분[(31±7)분vs(24±9)분]화F조부성정서평분[(30±8)분vs(25±7)분]균강저(P<0.05),P조정성정서평분[(25±7)분vs (34±8)분]증고(P<0.05),E조정성정서평분차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).술후두훈、악심、복통적발생솔량조비교차이무통계학의의;P조몽환발생솔(36.7%)고우E조(13.3%).마취만의도량조균체도100%. 결론 병박분사득인공유산부녀술후경역표현출적겁、열정등정성정서,저충정서변화여기기효쾌、소성쾌이급두훈、악심발생솔저무관.
Objective To investigate the effect of propofol on postoperative mood for women with artificial abortion.Methods One hundred and twenty cases of unmarried women scheduled for artificial abortion were randomly divided into two groups:propofol(group P) or etomidate (group E) in combination with sufentanil.The mood of women was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively by the positive and negative affect scale (PANAS).PANAS is composed of 20 adjectives,describing 10 of positive emotions and negative emotions,each of which has five answers,counted 1,2,3,4,5,respectively.Adverse reactions such as dreams,dizziness,abdominal pain and vomiting were recorded postoperatively.Results There were no significant differences in loss of consciousness time,awakening time,blood pressure,heart rate,the score of positive emotions,and the score of negative emotions between two groups preoperatively.After anesthesia,blood pressure and heart rate were lower in the group Pthan the group E [(74±12) mmHg vs (79±13) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),(69±16) bpm vs (74±17) bpm,P<0.05].Lower negative emotions scores postoperatively was found compared to that preoperatively in the group P and group E [(24±9) vs (31±7),(25±7) vs (30±8),P<0.05]respevtively.The score of positive emotions postoperatively was increased in the group P compared to that preoperatively [(25±7) vs (34±8),P<0.05],but no changes in the group E.No significance differences in the incidence of postoperative dizziness,nausea and abdominal pain was found between two groups.The incidence of dreams was 36.7% in the group P,and 13.3% in the group E.Conclusions Women anesthetized with propofol for artificial abortion were more likely to induce positive emotions postoperatively.The change of the mood is independent of its quick action of propofol and low incidence of dizziness and nausea.