中国保健营养(中旬刊)
中國保健營養(中旬刊)
중국보건영양(중순간)
China Hwalth Care & nutrition
2013年
1期
368-369
,共2页
妊娠期糖尿病%营养监测%营养素
妊娠期糖尿病%營養鑑測%營養素
임신기당뇨병%영양감측%영양소
Gestational diabetes mellitus%Nutrition monitoring%Nutrients
目的:通过调查和分析妊娠期糖尿病患者摄入各类营养素的情况及结局的发生情况,为妊娠期糖尿病患者合理饮食提供科学依据.方法:对我院250例确诊为妊娠期糖尿病的孕妇建立营养监测表,记录其一般情况(包括年龄、孕期、孕前体重、当前体重、BMI 指数)、各类营养素的实际摄入量情况和结局发生情况.采用单样本 t 检验比较摄入情况与推荐量的差别;运用频率法对结局情况进行统计分析.结果:在营养摄入方面,仅维生素 A 实际摄入量与推荐量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其余均有明显差异(P<0.05).蛋白质、脂肪、碳水化合物摄取不达标准率分别为52%、87%、82%.三餐供能比分别为24.8%、38.7%、36.5%.结论:妊娠期糖尿病孕妇在营养素摄取方面普遍存在摄取不平衡,需要根据实际情况加强对妊娠期糖尿病患者进行合理的饮食指导.
目的:通過調查和分析妊娠期糖尿病患者攝入各類營養素的情況及結跼的髮生情況,為妊娠期糖尿病患者閤理飲食提供科學依據.方法:對我院250例確診為妊娠期糖尿病的孕婦建立營養鑑測錶,記錄其一般情況(包括年齡、孕期、孕前體重、噹前體重、BMI 指數)、各類營養素的實際攝入量情況和結跼髮生情況.採用單樣本 t 檢驗比較攝入情況與推薦量的差彆;運用頻率法對結跼情況進行統計分析.結果:在營養攝入方麵,僅維生素 A 實際攝入量與推薦量差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),其餘均有明顯差異(P<0.05).蛋白質、脂肪、碳水化閤物攝取不達標準率分彆為52%、87%、82%.三餐供能比分彆為24.8%、38.7%、36.5%.結論:妊娠期糖尿病孕婦在營養素攝取方麵普遍存在攝取不平衡,需要根據實際情況加彊對妊娠期糖尿病患者進行閤理的飲食指導.
목적:통과조사화분석임신기당뇨병환자섭입각류영양소적정황급결국적발생정황,위임신기당뇨병환자합리음식제공과학의거.방법:대아원250례학진위임신기당뇨병적잉부건립영양감측표,기록기일반정황(포괄년령、잉기、잉전체중、당전체중、BMI 지수)、각류영양소적실제섭입량정황화결국발생정황.채용단양본 t 검험비교섭입정황여추천량적차별;운용빈솔법대결국정황진행통계분석.결과:재영양섭입방면,부유생소 A 실제섭입량여추천량차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),기여균유명현차이(P<0.05).단백질、지방、탄수화합물섭취불체표준솔분별위52%、87%、82%.삼찬공능비분별위24.8%、38.7%、36.5%.결론:임신기당뇨병잉부재영양소섭취방면보편존재섭취불평형,수요근거실제정황가강대임신기당뇨병환자진행합리적음식지도.
Objective: To analyze the intake of nutrients, minerals and trace elements in the gestational diabetes patients and the occurrence of adverse outcomes. To provide reasonable diet guidance to the gestational diabetes patients. Methods: To establish pregnancy nutrition surveillance tables for 250 cases diagnosed as gestational diabetes. Recorded their general conditions (age, pregnancy, pre-pregnancy weight, the current weight, the BMI index), actual intake of various nutrients, minerals, trace elements; the energy provided by the three major nutrients and their proportions;adverse outcomes. Single-sample t-test and frequency method were used for statistical analysis.Results: Compared with the recommended intake, the difference of vitamin A was no statistically significant (P> 0.05), while the rest showed significant differences (P <0.05). 52%, 87%, and 82% patients did not get enough protein, fat, and carbohydrate, respectively. 24.8%, 38.7%, and 36.5% energy were provided by three meals in a day, respectively. Conclusion: The gestational diabetes patients had widespread misunderstanding in the nutrient intake, resulting in unbalance nutrient intake. We should strengthen the guidance of gestational diabetes diet.