CAJ | 학술논문

目的：通过比较STA注射替硝唑碧蓝注射液与普通注射器注射碧蓝注射液，试验其在预防根管治疗约诊间痛方面的作用。方法利用（A组）STA局麻缓释系统牙周膜注入与（B组）普通注射器牙周膜注射碧蓝注射液，均一次性完成根管预备，7天后复诊确认约诊间痛例数，分析两种方法对约诊间痛的预防效果。结果 A组约诊间痛发病率明显低于B组（P<0.05）结论 STA注射替硝唑碧蓝注射液在预防约诊间痛明显优于普通注射碧蓝注射液。
목적：통과비교STA주사체초서벽람주사액여보통주사기주사벽람주사액，시험기재예방근관치료약진간통방면적작용。방법이용（A조）STA국마완석계통아주막주입여（B조）보통주사기아주막주사벽람주사액，균일차성완성근관예비，7천후복진학인약진간통례수，분석량충방법대약진간통적예방효과。결과 A조약진간통발병솔명현저우B조（P<0.05）결론 STA주사체초서벽람주사액재예방약진간통명현우우보통주사벽람주사액。
Objective: through the comparison of the STA injection of tinidazole injection and common blue blue syringe injection, test in the prevention of ELAP. Methods: Use of local anesthesia (group A) STA sustained release periodontal ligament injection (group B) and ordinary syringe periodontal ligament injection blue injection, one-time completion of root canal preparation, 7 days after the appointment confirmed ELAP cases, Analysis of two methods to prevent the effect of inter appointment pain Results: the incidence of dry socket in A group were significantly lower than those in B group ( P<0.05 ) conclusion: STA injection and Tinidazole Injection in the prevention of blue inter appointment pain is better than that of common injection blue injection.