CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨生活干预联合药物控制延缓糖尿病前期发展为糖尿病的程度。方法对2011年6月某高校体检确诊为糖尿病前期200例职工进行观察，随机分为干预组（生活干预+药物控制）与对照组，观察期限为2年，比较两组患者1年后、2年后基础信息和糖尿病患病率。结果两组糖尿病前期职工干预前基础信息比较差异无统计学意义；观察组1年后糖尿病患病率为1%，对照组为13%，差异有统计学意义（x2=11.06，P＜0.01）；观察组2年后糖尿病患病率为2%，对照组为20%，差异有统计学意义（x2=11.06， P＜0.01）。结论生活干预联合药物控制可能延缓糖尿病前期发展为糖尿病。
목적：탐토생활간예연합약물공제연완당뇨병전기발전위당뇨병적정도。방법대2011년6월모고교체검학진위당뇨병전기200례직공진행관찰，수궤분위간예조（생활간예+약물공제）여대조조，관찰기한위2년，비교량조환자1년후、2년후기출신식화당뇨병환병솔。결과량조당뇨병전기직공간예전기출신식비교차이무통계학의의；관찰조1년후당뇨병환병솔위1%，대조조위13%，차이유통계학의의（x2=11.06，P＜0.01）；관찰조2년후당뇨병환병솔위2%，대조조위20%，차이유통계학의의（x2=11.06， P＜0.01）。결론생활간예연합약물공제가능연완당뇨병전기발전위당뇨병。
Objective To investigate the role of the pre-diabetes intervention of college employees to diabetes mellitus. Methods 200 cases of college employee with pre-diabetes diagnosed at June 2011 were observed, who were randomly allocated to an intervention group(living intervention+pharmacological treatment) and a control group, which were observed for a period of two years. The basic information and diabetes prevalence after 1 year or 2 years in the two groups were compared. Results Differences of the basis information of employees with pre-diabetes between two groups were no statistically significant; one year later diabetes prevalence rate in the observation group was 1%, that in the control group was 13%, the difference was statistically significant (x2=11.06, P < 0.01); two years later diabetes prevalence rate in the observation group was 2%, which in the control group was 20%, the difference was statistically significant (x2=11.06, P < 0.01). Conclusion Living intervention and pharmacological treatment may delay the development of diabetes from pre-diabetes.