中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2014年
18期
128-130
,共3页
手术室压疮风险评估表%术中压疮%护理干预措施
手術室壓瘡風險評估錶%術中壓瘡%護理榦預措施
수술실압창풍험평고표%술중압창%호리간예조시
Pressure sore risk assessment scale of the operation room%Pressure ulcer%Nursing intervention
目的：探讨手术室压疮风险评估表在术中压疮高危患者中的效果。方法选择2014年1~3月我科手术患者116例，随机分为两组，每组58例，对照组给予常规压疮预防护理，观察组在对照组基础上采用自制手术室压疮风险评估表进行评估，并对中重度危险的患者给予针对性预防措施。比较两组患者压疮发生情况。结果2014年1~3月我科采用自制手术室压疮风险评估表评估高危患者58例，所有压疮风险评估正确，护理干预措施落实到位，观察组压疮发生1例，发生率为1.7%。对照组压疮发生6例，发生率为10.3%，两组患者压疮发生率比较差异有统计学意义（x2=4.435，P＜0.05）。结论应用自制手术室压疮风险评估表，使手术室护士能正确、客观评价患者各方面情况，正确的评估压疮高危患者，提高手术压疮风险的预见性，及时采取有效的护理干预措施，减少了术中压疮的发生。
目的：探討手術室壓瘡風險評估錶在術中壓瘡高危患者中的效果。方法選擇2014年1~3月我科手術患者116例，隨機分為兩組，每組58例，對照組給予常規壓瘡預防護理，觀察組在對照組基礎上採用自製手術室壓瘡風險評估錶進行評估，併對中重度危險的患者給予針對性預防措施。比較兩組患者壓瘡髮生情況。結果2014年1~3月我科採用自製手術室壓瘡風險評估錶評估高危患者58例，所有壓瘡風險評估正確，護理榦預措施落實到位，觀察組壓瘡髮生1例，髮生率為1.7%。對照組壓瘡髮生6例，髮生率為10.3%，兩組患者壓瘡髮生率比較差異有統計學意義（x2=4.435，P＜0.05）。結論應用自製手術室壓瘡風險評估錶，使手術室護士能正確、客觀評價患者各方麵情況，正確的評估壓瘡高危患者，提高手術壓瘡風險的預見性，及時採取有效的護理榦預措施，減少瞭術中壓瘡的髮生。
목적：탐토수술실압창풍험평고표재술중압창고위환자중적효과。방법선택2014년1~3월아과수술환자116례，수궤분위량조，매조58례，대조조급여상규압창예방호리，관찰조재대조조기출상채용자제수술실압창풍험평고표진행평고，병대중중도위험적환자급여침대성예방조시。비교량조환자압창발생정황。결과2014년1~3월아과채용자제수술실압창풍험평고표평고고위환자58례，소유압창풍험평고정학，호리간예조시락실도위，관찰조압창발생1례，발생솔위1.7%。대조조압창발생6례，발생솔위10.3%，량조환자압창발생솔비교차이유통계학의의（x2=4.435，P＜0.05）。결론응용자제수술실압창풍험평고표，사수술실호사능정학、객관평개환자각방면정황，정학적평고압창고위환자，제고수술압창풍험적예견성，급시채취유효적호리간예조시，감소료술중압창적발생。
Objective To study the assessment scale of pressure ulcer in patients at high risk of pressure ulcer risk in operation room. Methods 116 cases in our department operation from January to March 2014 were selected, randomly divided into two groups, 58 cases in each group, the control group was given routine bedsore prevention and nursing, the observation group based on the control group, were assessed by the self-made pressure sore risk assessment scale, and the severe danger of patients were given the preventive measures. Compared pressure ulcer incidence of two groups. Results There were 58 cases of high-risk patients from January to March 2014 in our department evaluated by self-made operation room pressure ulcer risk, all pressure sore risk assessment was correct, nursing intervention measures were put in place, the observation group of pressure ulcer occurred in 1 cases, the incidence rate was 1.7%. The control group was 6 cases,the incidence rate was 10.3%, The incidence of pressure ulcers of the two groups had statistical significance (x2=4.435, P<0.05). Conclusion The application of self-made pressure sore risk assessment scale to the operation room, helps nurses correct, objective evaluating of all aspects of the patient, correctly evaluate the pressure sore in patients at high risk, improve the predictability of operation pressure sore risk, timely and effective nursing interventions, reduces the incidence of pressure sores.
