浙江医学
浙江醫學
절강의학
ZHEJIANG MEDICAL JOURNAL
2013年
22期
2001-2003
,共3页
范德墉%施向东%姚瑾%董吉顺%胡小芹%刘波%韩运生%鲁平
範德墉%施嚮東%姚瑾%董吉順%鬍小芹%劉波%韓運生%魯平
범덕용%시향동%요근%동길순%호소근%류파%한운생%로평
肾活检%活检针%肾小球
腎活檢%活檢針%腎小毬
신활검%활검침%신소구
Renal biopsy%Biopsy needle%Glomerulum
目的:研究不同型号活检针对肾活检成功率及并发症的影响。方法将486例患者分成两组,16G组216例患者采用16 G Cru- cut手动活检针进行彩超引导下肾组织活检;18G组270例患者采用18 G Cru- cut活检针。16G活检针穿刺要求取材2条肾组织,18G活检针穿刺要求取材3条肾组织。结果两组活检总成功率94.44%。16G组活检成功率93.52%;平均穿刺次数(2.57±0.34)次;并发症发生率8.80%(肉眼血尿5.56%,肾包膜下血肿3.24%)。18G组活检成功率95.19%;平均穿刺次数(2.84±0.51)次;并发症发生率5.56%(肉眼血尿4.07%,肾包膜下血肿1.48%),两组成功率、并发症发生率均无统计学差异(均P>0.05),两组穿刺次数有统计学差异(P<0.01)。16G组光镜下平均肾小球数量(19.33±4.91)个;18G组光镜下平均肾小球数量(25.27±6.23)个;两组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论使用18G针进行超声引导下肾活检,虽多取材1次,但与16G针比较不增加并发症。两种活检针取材的有效肾小球数量有差异,但均可保证光镜、电镜及免疫荧光检测的标本质量。
目的:研究不同型號活檢針對腎活檢成功率及併髮癥的影響。方法將486例患者分成兩組,16G組216例患者採用16 G Cru- cut手動活檢針進行綵超引導下腎組織活檢;18G組270例患者採用18 G Cru- cut活檢針。16G活檢針穿刺要求取材2條腎組織,18G活檢針穿刺要求取材3條腎組織。結果兩組活檢總成功率94.44%。16G組活檢成功率93.52%;平均穿刺次數(2.57±0.34)次;併髮癥髮生率8.80%(肉眼血尿5.56%,腎包膜下血腫3.24%)。18G組活檢成功率95.19%;平均穿刺次數(2.84±0.51)次;併髮癥髮生率5.56%(肉眼血尿4.07%,腎包膜下血腫1.48%),兩組成功率、併髮癥髮生率均無統計學差異(均P>0.05),兩組穿刺次數有統計學差異(P<0.01)。16G組光鏡下平均腎小毬數量(19.33±4.91)箇;18G組光鏡下平均腎小毬數量(25.27±6.23)箇;兩組比較有統計學差異(P<0.05)。結論使用18G針進行超聲引導下腎活檢,雖多取材1次,但與16G針比較不增加併髮癥。兩種活檢針取材的有效腎小毬數量有差異,但均可保證光鏡、電鏡及免疫熒光檢測的標本質量。
목적:연구불동형호활검침대신활검성공솔급병발증적영향。방법장486례환자분성량조,16G조216례환자채용16 G Cru- cut수동활검침진행채초인도하신조직활검;18G조270례환자채용18 G Cru- cut활검침。16G활검침천자요구취재2조신조직,18G활검침천자요구취재3조신조직。결과량조활검총성공솔94.44%。16G조활검성공솔93.52%;평균천자차수(2.57±0.34)차;병발증발생솔8.80%(육안혈뇨5.56%,신포막하혈종3.24%)。18G조활검성공솔95.19%;평균천자차수(2.84±0.51)차;병발증발생솔5.56%(육안혈뇨4.07%,신포막하혈종1.48%),량조성공솔、병발증발생솔균무통계학차이(균P>0.05),량조천자차수유통계학차이(P<0.01)。16G조광경하평균신소구수량(19.33±4.91)개;18G조광경하평균신소구수량(25.27±6.23)개;량조비교유통계학차이(P<0.05)。결론사용18G침진행초성인도하신활검,수다취재1차,단여16G침비교불증가병발증。량충활검침취재적유효신소구수량유차이,단균가보증광경、전경급면역형광검측적표본질량。
Objective To compare the use of 16G and 18G biopsy needles in percutaneous ultrasound- guided renal biopsy. Methods Four hundred and eighty six patients undergoing percutaneous ultrasound- guided renal biopsy were as-signed to use 16G Cru- cut biopsy needle (n=216) or 18G needle (n=270). Two specimens of renal tissue were required to be taken for 16G group and 3 specimens were required for 18G group. Results The overal success rate of biopsy was 94.4%, that was 93.6%in 16G group and 95.2%in 18G group (P>0.05). The average biopsy times in 16G group was 2.57±0.34 and that in 18G group was 2.84±0.51(P<0.01). The complication rate in G16 group was 8.80%(gross hematuria 5.56%, subcapsular renal hematoma 3.24%) and that in G18 group was 5.56%(gross hematuria 4.07%, subcapsular renal hematoma 1.48%) (P>0.05). The average number of glomerulum under light microscope in 16G group was 19.33 ±4.91and that in 18G group was 25.27±6.23 (P<0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound- guided renal biopsies using 18G Cru- cut biopsy needle does not increase the incidence of complications, although one more specimen need to be taken compared to using 16G. The specimens of renal tis-sue taken using both needles meet standard of light, immunofluorescence and electron microscopic examinations.