中国肿瘤临床
中國腫瘤臨床
중국종류림상
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2013年
23期
1464-1467
,共4页
刘俊宝%张育荣%屈涛%史书萍%邵竹筠%杨婷婷%汤海舰%王楠%刘伟%高春会%崔成旭
劉俊寶%張育榮%屈濤%史書萍%邵竹筠%楊婷婷%湯海艦%王楠%劉偉%高春會%崔成旭
류준보%장육영%굴도%사서평%소죽균%양정정%탕해함%왕남%류위%고춘회%최성욱
结直肠癌%解救化疗方案%奥沙利铂%培美曲塞
結直腸癌%解救化療方案%奧沙利鉑%培美麯塞
결직장암%해구화료방안%오사리박%배미곡새
colorectal cancer%salvage chemotherapy agent%oxaliplatin pemetrexed
目的:通过回顾性分析奥沙利铂及伊立替康化疗失败的转移性结直肠癌化疗疗效,探索结直肠癌的解救化疗方案。方法:回顾2005年1月~2013年3月本院经奥沙利铂及伊立替康化疗失败的转移性结直肠癌患者37例,分析化疗的有效率(RR)及无进展生存(PFS)。结果:化疗总有效率13.51%(5/37),5例PR ,12例SD,20例PD;以培美曲塞为基础化疗方案总有效率略高于其他方案(17.64%vs.10.00%,P=0.64),未延长PFS(2.00个月vs.1.63个月,HR=0.79,95%CI:0.35~1.78,P=0.58);以雷替曲塞为基础的化疗方案有效率略高于其他方案(16.67%vs.12.00%,P=0.34),未延长PFS(1.58个月vs.1.90个月,HR=2.24,95%CI:0.98~5.12,P=0.06)。结论:以培美曲塞或雷替曲塞为基础的联合化疗方案对奥沙利铂及伊立替康化疗失败的转移性结直肠癌患者有一定疗效,值得进一步开展临床研究。
目的:通過迴顧性分析奧沙利鉑及伊立替康化療失敗的轉移性結直腸癌化療療效,探索結直腸癌的解救化療方案。方法:迴顧2005年1月~2013年3月本院經奧沙利鉑及伊立替康化療失敗的轉移性結直腸癌患者37例,分析化療的有效率(RR)及無進展生存(PFS)。結果:化療總有效率13.51%(5/37),5例PR ,12例SD,20例PD;以培美麯塞為基礎化療方案總有效率略高于其他方案(17.64%vs.10.00%,P=0.64),未延長PFS(2.00箇月vs.1.63箇月,HR=0.79,95%CI:0.35~1.78,P=0.58);以雷替麯塞為基礎的化療方案有效率略高于其他方案(16.67%vs.12.00%,P=0.34),未延長PFS(1.58箇月vs.1.90箇月,HR=2.24,95%CI:0.98~5.12,P=0.06)。結論:以培美麯塞或雷替麯塞為基礎的聯閤化療方案對奧沙利鉑及伊立替康化療失敗的轉移性結直腸癌患者有一定療效,值得進一步開展臨床研究。
목적:통과회고성분석오사리박급이립체강화료실패적전이성결직장암화료료효,탐색결직장암적해구화료방안。방법:회고2005년1월~2013년3월본원경오사리박급이립체강화료실패적전이성결직장암환자37례,분석화료적유효솔(RR)급무진전생존(PFS)。결과:화료총유효솔13.51%(5/37),5례PR ,12례SD,20례PD;이배미곡새위기출화료방안총유효솔략고우기타방안(17.64%vs.10.00%,P=0.64),미연장PFS(2.00개월vs.1.63개월,HR=0.79,95%CI:0.35~1.78,P=0.58);이뢰체곡새위기출적화료방안유효솔략고우기타방안(16.67%vs.12.00%,P=0.34),미연장PFS(1.58개월vs.1.90개월,HR=2.24,95%CI:0.98~5.12,P=0.06)。결론:이배미곡새혹뢰체곡새위기출적연합화료방안대오사리박급이립체강화료실패적전이성결직장암환자유일정료효,치득진일보개전림상연구。
Objective:This retrospective study aims to determine the efficacy of chemotherapy and improve a salvage chemother-apy agent for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) after failure of treatment with irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Methods:Between Janu-ary 2002 and March 2013, 37 patients with metastatic MCRC who had progressed after treatment with irinotecan and oxaliplatin were analyzed for their response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results:The overall RR of the 37 patients was 13.51%, with 5 cases of partial response (PR), 12 cases of disease stabilization (SD), and 20 cases of progression (PD). Compared with other chemo-therapy regimens, treatment with a pemetrexed-based chemotherapy agent had a higher RR (17.64%vs. 10.00%, P=0.64) without a lon-ger PFS (2.00 months vs. 1.63 months, HR=0.79, 95%, CI:0.35 to 1.78, P=0.58). Compared with other chemotherapy regimens, treat-ment with a raltirexed-based chemotherapy agent had a higher RR (16.67%vs. 12.00%, P=0.34) without a longer PFS (1.58 months vs. 1.90 months, HR=2.24, 95%, CI:0.98 to 5.12, P=0.06).Conclusion:In patients with MCRC after failure of treatment with irinotecan and oxaliplatin, a pemetrexed-based or raltirexed-based chemotherapy agent may beneficial during salvage treatment and is therefore worthy of further study.