华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）
華中科技大學學報（社會科學版）
화중과기대학학보（사회과학판）
JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
3期
32-36
,共5页
“是”与“应当是”%事实判断与价值判断%实然判断与应然判断%应当即必然有价值
“是”與“應噹是”%事實判斷與價值判斷%實然判斷與應然判斷%應噹即必然有價值
“시”여“응당시”%사실판단여개치판단%실연판단여응연판단%응당즉필연유개치
“to be” and “ought to be”%judgments in facts and judgments in value%to be a judgment and ought to be a judgment%“ought to be ” is“ be necessary valuable”
休谟所提出的“是”与“应当”（ ought to ）问题其实是“是”与“应当是”的关系问题，其中包括两个问题：事实判断如何与价值判断相推，实然判断如何与应然判断相推。如果认为应当即必然有价值，允许即可能有价值，这样虽然“是”与“应当是”不能直接相推，但“A是应当的”可以推出“A是有价值的”可以推出“A是允许的”。
休謨所提齣的“是”與“應噹”（ ought to ）問題其實是“是”與“應噹是”的關繫問題，其中包括兩箇問題：事實判斷如何與價值判斷相推，實然判斷如何與應然判斷相推。如果認為應噹即必然有價值，允許即可能有價值，這樣雖然“是”與“應噹是”不能直接相推，但“A是應噹的”可以推齣“A是有價值的”可以推齣“A是允許的”。
휴모소제출적“시”여“응당”（ ought to ）문제기실시“시”여“응당시”적관계문제，기중포괄량개문제：사실판단여하여개치판단상추，실연판단여하여응연판단상추。여과인위응당즉필연유개치，윤허즉가능유개치，저양수연“시”여“응당시”불능직접상추，단“A시응당적”가이추출“A시유개치적”가이추출“A시윤허적”。
Hume ’ s“is” and “ought to” question is about the relationship between “to be” and “ought to be” which includes two questions:how to infer judgments in facts and judgments in value , and how to infer to be judgment and ought to be judgment .“Ought to be” is thought to “be necessarily valuable”,“permit” is“possibly valuable”, thus, although such a “to be” and “ought to be” can not be directly inferred with each other,“A ought to be” can infer “A is valuable”, and“A is valuable” can infer “A is permissible .”
