中国医师杂志
中國醫師雜誌
중국의사잡지
JOURNAL OF CHINESE PHYSICIAN
2014年
2期
218-220
,共3页
黄术%张宏其%刘宝荣%周益昭%翁晓军%盛斌%肖晟
黃術%張宏其%劉寶榮%週益昭%翁曉軍%盛斌%肖晟
황술%장굉기%류보영%주익소%옹효군%성빈%초성
抗结核药%迟效制剂%微球体%骨密度
抗結覈藥%遲效製劑%微毬體%骨密度
항결핵약%지효제제%미구체%골밀도
Antitubercular agents%Delayed-action preparations%Microspheres%Bone density
目的:观察缓释抗结核微球填充于骨支架后的骨密度测试情况,为减少术后抗结核治疗的副作用提供实验依据。方法采用骨密度仪分别观察人工同种异体骨( A组)、利福平( RFP )缓释微球-人工同种异体骨缓释复合体( B组)和RFP-人工同种异体骨复合体( C组)灌注前后骨密度的变化。结果灌注前A、B、C三组骨密度差异无统计学意义[ A组:(0.191±0.018)g/cm2;B组:(0.186±0.016)g/cm2;C组:(0.189±0.018)g/cm2;P >0.05],而灌注后A、B、C三组骨密度差异亦无统计学意义[A组:(0.191±0.018)g/cm2;B组:(0.179±0.023)g/cm2;C组:(0.185±0.021)g/cm2;P >0.05]。结论RFP微球使用超声波振荡方法可以与多孔隙的骨制备成抗结核缓释复合体,且灌注后不会对骨密度产生明显的干扰作用。
目的:觀察緩釋抗結覈微毬填充于骨支架後的骨密度測試情況,為減少術後抗結覈治療的副作用提供實驗依據。方法採用骨密度儀分彆觀察人工同種異體骨( A組)、利福平( RFP )緩釋微毬-人工同種異體骨緩釋複閤體( B組)和RFP-人工同種異體骨複閤體( C組)灌註前後骨密度的變化。結果灌註前A、B、C三組骨密度差異無統計學意義[ A組:(0.191±0.018)g/cm2;B組:(0.186±0.016)g/cm2;C組:(0.189±0.018)g/cm2;P >0.05],而灌註後A、B、C三組骨密度差異亦無統計學意義[A組:(0.191±0.018)g/cm2;B組:(0.179±0.023)g/cm2;C組:(0.185±0.021)g/cm2;P >0.05]。結論RFP微毬使用超聲波振盪方法可以與多孔隙的骨製備成抗結覈緩釋複閤體,且灌註後不會對骨密度產生明顯的榦擾作用。
목적:관찰완석항결핵미구전충우골지가후적골밀도측시정황,위감소술후항결핵치료적부작용제공실험의거。방법채용골밀도의분별관찰인공동충이체골( A조)、리복평( RFP )완석미구-인공동충이체골완석복합체( B조)화RFP-인공동충이체골복합체( C조)관주전후골밀도적변화。결과관주전A、B、C삼조골밀도차이무통계학의의[ A조:(0.191±0.018)g/cm2;B조:(0.186±0.016)g/cm2;C조:(0.189±0.018)g/cm2;P >0.05],이관주후A、B、C삼조골밀도차이역무통계학의의[A조:(0.191±0.018)g/cm2;B조:(0.179±0.023)g/cm2;C조:(0.185±0.021)g/cm2;P >0.05]。결론RFP미구사용초성파진탕방법가이여다공극적골제비성항결핵완석복합체,차관주후불회대골밀도산생명현적간우작용。
Objective To investigate bone mineral density ( BMD ) after filling in the bone scaffolds with anti-tuberculosis controlled-release microspheres, and provide experimental basis for decrease of the side effects of anti-tuberculosis therapy after spinal surgery.Methods The bone densitometer was used to observe the changes of bone mineral density before and after the infusion with the artificial allograft bone (Group A), the controlled release complex of the RFP controlled-release microspheres-artificial allograft bone (Group B), and RFP-artificial allograft bone complex (Group C), respectively.Results BMDs of three groups before perfusion were not different significantly [Group A:(0.191 ±0.018)g/cm2;Group B:(0.186 ±0.016)g/cm2;Group C:(0.189 ±0.018)g/cm2;P >0.05].BMDs of three groups after perfusion were not different significantly [Group A:(0.191 ±0.018)g/cm2;Group B:(0.179 ±0.023)g/cm2;Group C:(0.185 ±0.021)g/cm2;P >0.05].Conclusions RFP microspheres using ultrasonic vibration method and the porous bone were prepared to controlled-release anti-tuberculosis complex .BMD of three groups after perfusion were not influenced obviously .