中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2014年
8期
174-176
,共3页
乙型肝炎%乙肝后肝硬化失代偿期%疗效%经济学研究
乙型肝炎%乙肝後肝硬化失代償期%療效%經濟學研究
을형간염%을간후간경화실대상기%료효%경제학연구
Hepatitis B%Decompensated liver cirrhosis following hepatitis B%Efficacy%Economic study
目的:对乙肝后肝硬化失代偿期患者分别采用抗病毒治疗和一般护肝治疗,观察两组患者的临床疗效及经济学效益差异。方法选择我院接诊的155例乙肝后肝硬化失代偿期患者,其中98例患者采用抗病毒治疗(实验组),57例患者仅采用一般护肝治疗(对照组)。疗程结束后,观察两组患者的临床疗效,同时进行经济成本与效果分析。结果实验组患者死亡5例,对照组患者死亡18例,占总死亡率的78.2%。且临床疗效实验组患者明显优于对照(P<0.05);经济成本与效果分析,实验组患者经济成本明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论采用抗病毒药物治疗乙肝后肝硬化失代偿期患者疗效好、费用低,是治疗乙肝后肝硬化失代偿期患者的重要治疗手段。
目的:對乙肝後肝硬化失代償期患者分彆採用抗病毒治療和一般護肝治療,觀察兩組患者的臨床療效及經濟學效益差異。方法選擇我院接診的155例乙肝後肝硬化失代償期患者,其中98例患者採用抗病毒治療(實驗組),57例患者僅採用一般護肝治療(對照組)。療程結束後,觀察兩組患者的臨床療效,同時進行經濟成本與效果分析。結果實驗組患者死亡5例,對照組患者死亡18例,佔總死亡率的78.2%。且臨床療效實驗組患者明顯優于對照(P<0.05);經濟成本與效果分析,實驗組患者經濟成本明顯低于對照組(P<0.05)。結論採用抗病毒藥物治療乙肝後肝硬化失代償期患者療效好、費用低,是治療乙肝後肝硬化失代償期患者的重要治療手段。
목적:대을간후간경화실대상기환자분별채용항병독치료화일반호간치료,관찰량조환자적림상료효급경제학효익차이。방법선택아원접진적155례을간후간경화실대상기환자,기중98례환자채용항병독치료(실험조),57례환자부채용일반호간치료(대조조)。료정결속후,관찰량조환자적림상료효,동시진행경제성본여효과분석。결과실험조환자사망5례,대조조환자사망18례,점총사망솔적78.2%。차림상료효실험조환자명현우우대조(P<0.05);경제성본여효과분석,실험조환자경제성본명현저우대조조(P<0.05)。결론채용항병독약물치료을간후간경화실대상기환자료효호、비용저,시치료을간후간경화실대상기환자적중요치료수단。
Objective To observe the differences in clinical efficacy and economic benefits between the two groups of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis following hepatitis B who received antiviral treatment and ordinary liver protection treatment respectively. Methods 155 patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis following hepatitis B who were admitted to our hospital were selected, of which 98 patients received antiviral treatment(experimental group) and 57 patients only received ordinary liver protection treatment(control group). After treatment, clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed and meanwhile their economic costs and effects were analyzed. Results Five patients died in the experimental group and 18 patients died in the control group, accounting for 78.2%of the total death rate. The experimental group had significantly better clinical efficacy than the control group(P < 0.05); In terms of economic cost and effect analysis, the experimental group had significantly lower economic cost than the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of decompensated liver cirrhosis following hepatitis B, antiviral drug treatment has good efficacy and low cost, which is an important treatment method for the patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis following hepatitis B.