CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨两种不同方法治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎的疗效。方法选取我院收治的70例慢性细菌性前列腺炎患者，随机分为两组：对照组35例，给予口服抗生素治疗；治疗组35例，给予口服中药、抗生素及坐浴等综合治疗。治疗6周后，比较两组患者症状评分及临床疗效。结果两组治疗前后组内比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组治疗后差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组治疗总有效率分别为97.1%和71.4%，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论中西药联合中药坐浴治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎的疗效较单纯使用抗生素更显著，能有效减轻症状，提高疗效。
목적：탐토량충불동방법치료만성세균성전렬선염적료효。방법선취아원수치적70례만성세균성전렬선염환자，수궤분위량조：대조조35례，급여구복항생소치료；치료조35례，급여구복중약、항생소급좌욕등종합치료。치료6주후，비교량조환자증상평분급림상료효。결과량조치료전후조내비교，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）；량조치료후차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。량조치료총유효솔분별위97.1%화71.4%，차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론중서약연합중약좌욕치료만성세균성전렬선염적료효교단순사용항생소경현저，능유효감경증상，제고료효。
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of two different methods for chronic bacterial prostatitis. Methods 70 patients were randomly divided into treatment group(35 patients) and control group(35 patients). The control group only took antibiotics, while treatment group took treatment of western medicine, internal medicine and sitting bath. Symptom scores and clinical efficacy were observed. Restults It was statistically significant different for each group and between the two groups after the treatment(P<0.05). The total effective rate of two groups were 97.1%and 71.4%, so it was significant different(P<0.05). Conclusion The method of combine western medicine, internal medicine and sitting bath for chronic bacterial prostatitis is better than the other one and it can relieve symptoms and increase clinical efficacy.