实用临床医药杂志
實用臨床醫藥雜誌
실용림상의약잡지
JOURNAL OF JIANGSU CLINICAL MEDICINE
2014年
10期
25-27
,共3页
慢性阻塞性肺疾病%集束化干预%生活质量
慢性阻塞性肺疾病%集束化榦預%生活質量
만성조새성폐질병%집속화간예%생활질량
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease%intensive intervention%quality of life
目的：探讨集束化干预对慢性阻塞性肺病（COPD）稳定期患者生活质量的影响。方法将80例 COPD 稳定期患者分为干预组与对照组各40例，干预组给予体能锻炼、呼吸肌锻炼、氧疗、宣教、心理与行为干预等综合健康教育与管理措施，对照组仅在门诊取药治疗。利用生活质量量表（SGRQ）评分标准分别在治疗前后对2组患者生活质量予以评估。结果入组前2组患者 SGRQ 呼吸症状、疾病影响及 SGRQ 各项指标比较无显著性差异（P ＞0.05），干预组患者治疗后 SGRQ 呼吸症状、疾病影响及 SGRQ 各项指标与治疗前比较有显著性差异（P ＜0.05）；对照组治疗后各项指标与治疗前相比较无显著性差异（P ＞0.05），干预组与对照组干预后各项指标比较有显著性差异（P ＜0.05）。结论集束化干预能够有效提高 COPD 稳定期患者生活质量。
目的：探討集束化榦預對慢性阻塞性肺病（COPD）穩定期患者生活質量的影響。方法將80例 COPD 穩定期患者分為榦預組與對照組各40例，榦預組給予體能鍛煉、呼吸肌鍛煉、氧療、宣教、心理與行為榦預等綜閤健康教育與管理措施，對照組僅在門診取藥治療。利用生活質量量錶（SGRQ）評分標準分彆在治療前後對2組患者生活質量予以評估。結果入組前2組患者 SGRQ 呼吸癥狀、疾病影響及 SGRQ 各項指標比較無顯著性差異（P ＞0.05），榦預組患者治療後 SGRQ 呼吸癥狀、疾病影響及 SGRQ 各項指標與治療前比較有顯著性差異（P ＜0.05）；對照組治療後各項指標與治療前相比較無顯著性差異（P ＞0.05），榦預組與對照組榦預後各項指標比較有顯著性差異（P ＜0.05）。結論集束化榦預能夠有效提高 COPD 穩定期患者生活質量。
목적：탐토집속화간예대만성조새성폐병（COPD）은정기환자생활질량적영향。방법장80례 COPD 은정기환자분위간예조여대조조각40례，간예조급여체능단련、호흡기단련、양료、선교、심리여행위간예등종합건강교육여관리조시，대조조부재문진취약치료。이용생활질량량표（SGRQ）평분표준분별재치료전후대2조환자생활질량여이평고。결과입조전2조환자 SGRQ 호흡증상、질병영향급 SGRQ 각항지표비교무현저성차이（P ＞0.05），간예조환자치료후 SGRQ 호흡증상、질병영향급 SGRQ 각항지표여치료전비교유현저성차이（P ＜0.05）；대조조치료후각항지표여치료전상비교무현저성차이（P ＞0.05），간예조여대조조간예후각항지표비교유현저성차이（P ＜0.05）。결론집속화간예능구유효제고 COPD 은정기환자생활질량。
Objective To explore the effect of intensive intervention on quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)in stable period.Methods 80 pa-tients with COPD in stable period were divided into intervention group (n =40)and control group (n =40).The patients in the intervention group were given health education and administration measures in physical exercise,respiratory muscle exercise,oxygen therapy,education,psychologi-cal and behavioral intervention while the patients in the control group were treated with drugs. And quality of life of two groups before and after the treatment was evaluated by St George′s respi-ratory questionnaire (SGRQ).Results The difference was not statistically significant in respirato-ry symptoms,disease impact and the SGRQ indicators of the two groups (P >0.05).After the in-tervention,the difference was not statistically significant in the intervention group in respiratory symptoms ,disease impact and the SGRQ indicators compared with the treatment before (P <0.05).The difference was not statistically significant in the indicators in the control group (P >0.05).The difference was statistically significant in indicators after the intervention in the inter-vention group and control group.Conclusion Intensive intervention can improve the quality of life in patients with COPD in stable period.
