CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨2型糖尿病患者心理特征及干预效果。方法收集2型糖尿病患者258例，随机分为观察组和对照组各129例，观察组给予常规治疗及护理，对照组在此基础上加强心理干预。评价两组焦虑自评价表（SAS）、抑郁自评量表（SDS）评分差异。结果两组经治疗及护理后，SAS和SDS的评分均明显改善，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)；而观察组评分改善由于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论在2型糖尿病患者的治疗及护理过程中，应重视其心理状态并进行心理，可以解除其不良心理状态，增强治疗依从性。
목적탐토2형당뇨병환자심리특정급간예효과。방법수집2형당뇨병환자258례，수궤분위관찰조화대조조각129례，관찰조급여상규치료급호리，대조조재차기출상가강심리간예。평개량조초필자평개표（SAS）、억욱자평량표（SDS）평분차이。결과량조경치료급호리후，SAS화SDS적평분균명현개선，차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05)；이관찰조평분개선유우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론재2형당뇨병환자적치료급호리과정중，응중시기심리상태병진행심리，가이해제기불양심리상태，증강치료의종성。
Objective To investigate the psychological characteristics and intervention effects of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods 258 cases of T2DM were collected and divided into observation group and control group (129 cases in each group). The control group accepted ordinary treatments and nursing, besides those the observation group accepted psychological intervention. We compared the scores of Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDA) in both groups. Results After the ordinary treatments and nursing, the SAS and SDS in each was improved (AllP<0.05). The SAS and SDS in observation group were better than those in control group (AllP<0.05). Conclusion In the course of treatments and nursing to T2DM, we should pay attention to the psychological characteristics and conduct psychological intervention which could eliminate bad psychological state and promote compliance.