CAJ | 학술논문

比较文学初创时期的法国学派，坚持以实证主义的态度，关照不同国家不同民族之间文学上的事实联系，以影响研究为自己安身立命之根本。法国学派在初创时期因为历史无可避免的局限性，以其自身理论与实践相脱节的缺陷，被后来学者指责陷入了狭隘的民族中心主义。笔者认为，对法国学派的影响研究的全面认识。应该细读和反思元典著作，立足于学科经典著作的原始语境来整体把握。
비교문학초창시기적법국학파，견지이실증주의적태도，관조불동국가불동민족지간문학상적사실련계，이영향연구위자기안신립명지근본。법국학파재초창시기인위역사무가피면적국한성，이기자신이론여실천상탈절적결함，피후래학자지책함입료협애적민족중심주의。필자인위，대법국학파적영향연구적전면인식。응해세독화반사원전저작，립족우학과경전저작적원시어경래정체파악。
In the pioneering days of comparative literature, the French School, regarding influence research as the essence to rely upon, insists on paying attention to the factual relations in literature among different countries and various ethnic groups. The French School is criticized by later scholars for having fallen into the category of narrow ethnocentrism, due to the unavoidable limitation of history at the beginning, and its own defect that the theory has been divorced from the practice. The author holds that one should carefully read and reflect upon classic works of disciplines to comprehensively learn about the influence research of the French School, and grasp it as a whole in the original context of those classic works.