食品与药品
食品與藥品
식품여약품
FOOD AND DRUG
2013年
5期
335-336,337
,共3页
陈玉明%王德全%谢仁古丽%吴玉莲
陳玉明%王德全%謝仁古麗%吳玉蓮
진옥명%왕덕전%사인고려%오옥련
曲安奈德%冲击波%肩周炎
麯安奈德%遲擊波%肩週炎
곡안내덕%충격파%견주염
triamcinolone acetonide%shock wave%periarthritis
目的观察曲安奈德关节腔注射、冲击波治疗肩周炎与物理治疗的临床效果及安全性。方法将120例肩周炎患者分为3组,每组40例。对照组:采用非甾体消炎药塞来昔布200 mg口服+局部微波及偏振光照射;曲安奈德肩关节腔注射组:自肩峰下方肱骨大结节上方间隙中入注关节腔及肱骨大结节区痛点,注射曲安奈德10 mg,每周1次,连续3次;冲击波组:给予1.5~2.5 MPa治疗压力,频率10 Hz,冲击剂量1800~2000次,共治疗4周。比较3组患者的治疗前、治疗后第4周、8周疼痛缓解评价、治疗后8周疗效判断。结果两治疗组效果均优于对照组,两组之间无差异。结论曲安萘德与冲击波组均能能有效地应用于肩周炎治疗,冲击波更在对有肾上腺皮质激素禁忌症的患者中具有优越性。
目的觀察麯安奈德關節腔註射、遲擊波治療肩週炎與物理治療的臨床效果及安全性。方法將120例肩週炎患者分為3組,每組40例。對照組:採用非甾體消炎藥塞來昔佈200 mg口服+跼部微波及偏振光照射;麯安奈德肩關節腔註射組:自肩峰下方肱骨大結節上方間隙中入註關節腔及肱骨大結節區痛點,註射麯安奈德10 mg,每週1次,連續3次;遲擊波組:給予1.5~2.5 MPa治療壓力,頻率10 Hz,遲擊劑量1800~2000次,共治療4週。比較3組患者的治療前、治療後第4週、8週疼痛緩解評價、治療後8週療效判斷。結果兩治療組效果均優于對照組,兩組之間無差異。結論麯安萘德與遲擊波組均能能有效地應用于肩週炎治療,遲擊波更在對有腎上腺皮質激素禁忌癥的患者中具有優越性。
목적관찰곡안내덕관절강주사、충격파치료견주염여물리치료적림상효과급안전성。방법장120례견주염환자분위3조,매조40례。대조조:채용비치체소염약새래석포200 mg구복+국부미파급편진광조사;곡안내덕견관절강주사조:자견봉하방굉골대결절상방간극중입주관절강급굉골대결절구통점,주사곡안내덕10 mg,매주1차,련속3차;충격파조:급여1.5~2.5 MPa치료압력,빈솔10 Hz,충격제량1800~2000차,공치료4주。비교3조환자적치료전、치료후제4주、8주동통완해평개、치료후8주료효판단。결과량치료조효과균우우대조조,량조지간무차이。결론곡안내덕여충격파조균능능유효지응용우견주염치료,충격파경재대유신상선피질격소금기증적환자중구유우월성。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of periarthritis by triamcinolone acetonide injected into articular cavity, shock wave treatment and physical therapy, respectively. Methods One hundred and twenty cases with periarthritis were divided into three groups and 40 cases were in each group. In controlled group, the non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug celecoxib 200 mg oral combined with local microwave and polarized light irradiation was adopted. In the group of triamcinolone acetonide injected into shoulder joint cavity, triamcinolone acetonide 10 mg once a week was injected from the clearance of the below of shoulder peak and the above of greater tuberosity into articular cavity and pain points of the greater tuberosity of humerus area for three times. Shock wave group was given 1.5-2.5 MPa pressure treatment for a total of 4 weeks with10 Hz frequency and impact doses of 1800-2000 times. The status of pain relief was evaluated before and after treatment of 4 weeks, 8 weeks in three groups and the curative effect was judged after treatment of 8 weeks. Results Compared with the controlled group, the curative effect was better in the both of treatment groups, and no difference existed between two groups. Conclusion Triamcinolone acetonide and shock wave can effectively be applied to the treatment of periarthritis. Shock wave has the superiority in the patients with contraindications to adrenocortical hormones.