中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2013年
31期
6-6,8
,共2页
骨科%创伤感染%负压封闭引流技术%临床疗效
骨科%創傷感染%負壓封閉引流技術%臨床療效
골과%창상감염%부압봉폐인류기술%림상료효
Orthopedics%Trauma of infection%VSD%Clinical therapeutic effects
目的：探讨负压封闭引流（VSD）技术治疗骨科创伤感染的临床疗效。方法选取我院骨科80例创伤感染患者，分为2组，对照组40例，实验组40例，对照组采用常规治疗方法，实验组采用VSD技术治疗，比较2组患者的临床疗效。结果对照组治愈17例（42.5%），显效14例（35%），有效率为77.5%；实验组治愈28例（70%），显效11例（27.5%），有效率为97.5%，实验组疗效明显高于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论VSD治疗骨科创伤感染的临床疗效明显优于常规治疗，值得临床推广。
目的：探討負壓封閉引流（VSD）技術治療骨科創傷感染的臨床療效。方法選取我院骨科80例創傷感染患者，分為2組，對照組40例，實驗組40例，對照組採用常規治療方法，實驗組採用VSD技術治療，比較2組患者的臨床療效。結果對照組治愈17例（42.5%），顯效14例（35%），有效率為77.5%；實驗組治愈28例（70%），顯效11例（27.5%），有效率為97.5%，實驗組療效明顯高于對照組（P＜0.05）。結論VSD治療骨科創傷感染的臨床療效明顯優于常規治療，值得臨床推廣。
목적：탐토부압봉폐인류（VSD）기술치료골과창상감염적림상료효。방법선취아원골과80례창상감염환자，분위2조，대조조40례，실험조40례，대조조채용상규치료방법，실험조채용VSD기술치료，비교2조환자적림상료효。결과대조조치유17례（42.5%），현효14례（35%），유효솔위77.5%；실험조치유28례（70%），현효11례（27.5%），유효솔위97.5%，실험조료효명현고우대조조（P＜0.05）。결론VSD치료골과창상감염적림상료효명현우우상규치료，치득림상추엄。
Objective To investigate the clinical therapeutic effects of the VSD technique in the treatment of orthopedic trauma of infection. Methods 80 cases of Department of orthopedics in trauma patients in our hospital were divided into two groups, the control group, 40 cases and the experimental group, 40 cases. The control group was treated with the traditional method and the experimental group was treated with VSD technique. The therapeutic effects in these two groups were evaluated. Results Control group, 17 patients cured(42.5%), 14 cases markedly effective (35%), and the efifciency of 77.5%. Experimental group, 28 patients cured(70%), 11 cases markedly effective(27.5% ), and the efficiency of 97.5%. The effect of experimental group was signiifcantly higher than that of control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Therapeutic effects of VSD technique in the treatment of orthopedic trauma of infection are better than the traditional method and it deserves to be promoted widely.
