CAJ | 학술논문

　　目的探索盐酸胺碘酮治疗冠心病快速心律失常患者的临床治疗效果。方法将收集到的62例冠心病快速心律失常患者随机分为治疗组和对照组两组，对照组采用普罗帕酮进行治疗，治疗组采用盐酸胺碘酮进行治疗，比较两组的临床治疗疗效。结果两组患者临床疗效比较：治疗组显效18例，有效8例，无效5例；对照组显效8例，有效11例，无效12例。两组临床疗效比较组间资料采用χ2检验， P=0.0273＜0.05，两组资料比较差异有统计学意义。结论采用盐酸胺碘酮治疗急诊冠心病快速心律失常的治疗效果优于使用普罗帕酮的治疗效果，且不良反应相对较少，胺碘酮是治疗此类疾病的理想的药物之一，值得在临床上推广使用。
　　목적탐색염산알전동치료관심병쾌속심률실상환자적림상치료효과。방법장수집도적62례관심병쾌속심률실상환자수궤분위치료조화대조조량조，대조조채용보라파동진행치료，치료조채용염산알전동진행치료，비교량조적림상치료료효。결과량조환자림상료효비교：치료조현효18례，유효8례，무효5례；대조조현효8례，유효11례，무효12례。량조림상료효비교조간자료채용χ2검험， P=0.0273＜0.05，량조자료비교차이유통계학의의。결론채용염산알전동치료급진관심병쾌속심률실상적치료효과우우사용보라파동적치료효과，차불량반응상대교소，알전동시치료차류질병적이상적약물지일，치득재림상상추엄사용。
Objective Explore amiodarone hydrochloride clinical effect in patients with coronary heart tachyarrhythmia. Methods Will be collected from 62 patients with coronary artery disease tachyarrhythmia patients were randomly divided into a treatment group and control group, the control group using propafenone treatment, the treatment group amiodarone treatment, the two groups were compared clinical efifcacy. Result The patients clinical efifcacy comparison:the treatment group, 18 cases markedly effective in 8 cases, 5 cases ineffective;control group, 8 cases were markedly effective in 11 cases, 12 cases. Comparison of clinical efifcacy between the groups data usingχ2 test, P=0.0273<0.05, two sets of data comparing the difference was statistically signiifcant. Conclusion Treatment more effective than amiodarone hydrochloride emergency coronary heart disease tachyarrhythmias propafenone treatment effect, and relatively few adverse reactions, amiodarone is one of the ideal drug to treat such diseases in clinicalpromoting the use.