中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2013年
10期
1047-1049,1050
,共4页
陈劲松%雷建%黄炯强%胡明%柯传烽%詹高房
陳勁鬆%雷建%黃炯彊%鬍明%柯傳烽%詹高房
진경송%뢰건%황형강%호명%가전봉%첨고방
讨论式教学%临床见习%普通外科学
討論式教學%臨床見習%普通外科學
토론식교학%림상견습%보통외과학
Discussion-based teaching%Clinical noviciate%General surgery
目的:评价讨论式教学在普外科见习教学中的应用效果。方法将临床医学专业普外科见习生210名随机分为实验组和对照组,每组各105人,实验组采用讨论式教学,对照组采用传统教学。见习结束后,组织考试和问卷调查,计量资料用t检验,计数资料用字2检验。结果实验组和对照组学生对教学方法的满意度分别为88.6%和70.5%(P<0.05);实验组和对照组平均考试成绩分别为(80.3±9.2)分和(74.5±11.3)分(P<0.05);实验组和对照组的考试成绩及格率分别为97.1%和88.6%(P<0.05);实验组和对照组的考试成绩优秀率分别为24.8%和12.4%(P<0.05);实验组绝大多数学生认为讨论式教学在提高自身学习主动性和积极性、提升分析和解决问题能力等方面具有明显优势。结论讨论式教学是有效的普外科见习教学方法,优于传统教学。
目的:評價討論式教學在普外科見習教學中的應用效果。方法將臨床醫學專業普外科見習生210名隨機分為實驗組和對照組,每組各105人,實驗組採用討論式教學,對照組採用傳統教學。見習結束後,組織攷試和問捲調查,計量資料用t檢驗,計數資料用字2檢驗。結果實驗組和對照組學生對教學方法的滿意度分彆為88.6%和70.5%(P<0.05);實驗組和對照組平均攷試成績分彆為(80.3±9.2)分和(74.5±11.3)分(P<0.05);實驗組和對照組的攷試成績及格率分彆為97.1%和88.6%(P<0.05);實驗組和對照組的攷試成績優秀率分彆為24.8%和12.4%(P<0.05);實驗組絕大多數學生認為討論式教學在提高自身學習主動性和積極性、提升分析和解決問題能力等方麵具有明顯優勢。結論討論式教學是有效的普外科見習教學方法,優于傳統教學。
목적:평개토론식교학재보외과견습교학중적응용효과。방법장림상의학전업보외과견습생210명수궤분위실험조화대조조,매조각105인,실험조채용토론식교학,대조조채용전통교학。견습결속후,조직고시화문권조사,계량자료용t검험,계수자료용자2검험。결과실험조화대조조학생대교학방법적만의도분별위88.6%화70.5%(P<0.05);실험조화대조조평균고시성적분별위(80.3±9.2)분화(74.5±11.3)분(P<0.05);실험조화대조조적고시성적급격솔분별위97.1%화88.6%(P<0.05);실험조화대조조적고시성적우수솔분별위24.8%화12.4%(P<0.05);실험조절대다수학생인위토론식교학재제고자신학습주동성화적겁성、제승분석화해결문제능력등방면구유명현우세。결론토론식교학시유효적보외과견습교학방법,우우전통교학。
Objective To evaluate the effect of discussion-based teaching pattern in clinical noviciate of general surgery. Methods Two hundred and ten students majoring in clinical medicine were randomly divided into the trial group and the control group during clinical noviciate of general surgery.There were 105 students in each group. The discussion-based teaching pattern and traditional teaching pattern were performed in the trial and control groups,respectively. After the clinical novici-ate of general surgery was completed,the teaching effects of both groups were evaluated by the exam-ination performance analyses and the questionnaire-based survey. Student's t-test andχ22 test were used in statistical analysis. Reults The rate of satisfaction with the teaching pattern was 88.6%in the trial group and 70.5%in control group(P<0.05). The mean scores in the trial group and control group were 80.3±9.2 and 74.5±11.3,respectively (P<0.05). The pass rate of examination in the trial group and control group were 97.1% and 88.6%,respectively (P<0.05). The excellence rate in the examination was 24.8%in the trial group and 12.4%in control group (P<0.05). The overwhelming majority of stu-dents in the trial group thought that the discussion-based teaching pattern had more advantages in im-proving students' learning initiative and enthusiasm,ability to analyze and solve problems,etc.,acord-ing to the questionnaire-based survey. Conclusions Discussion-based teaching is an effective teach-ing pattern and superior to the traditional teaching pattern.