CAJ | 학술논문

《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》将滥用职权作为法院撤销被诉具体行政行为的法定理由,为防止行政权行使的肆意提供了司法保障,但是在我国当下的现实中,无论是行政法理论还是实务中,都对＂滥用职权＂的认识存在纷争。本文试根据行政权与司法权之间的分权制衡,界定滥用职权司法审查的界限与深度,以期明晰在司法审查中法官需要把握的适用标准。
《중화인민공화국행정소송법》장람용직권작위법원철소피소구체행정행위적법정이유,위방지행정권행사적사의제공료사법보장,단시재아국당하적현실중,무론시행정법이론환시실무중,도대＂람용직권＂적인식존재분쟁。본문시근거행정권여사법권지간적분권제형,계정람용직권사법심사적계한여심도,이기명석재사법심사중법관수요파악적괄용표준。
In Administrative Procedure Law of the People＇s Republic China,power abuse is taken as the legal grounds for the court to withdraw the specific administrative acts,which provides judicial protection to prevent the arbitrary exercise of executive power.But in reality,disputes exist on recognition of power abuse both in the theory and practice of administrative law.This paper defines the limits and depth of judicial review on power abuse based on the balance between the executive power and the judicial power in order to clear the applicable standards that judges should grasp in judicial review.