CAJ | 학술논문

最高院颁布的《关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》，在第26条赋予了实际施工人直接向发包人主张工程款的权利，这是对合同相对性原则的突破。本文首先通过分析实际施工人的内涵和外延，希望明确适用第26条的实际施工人都是基于借用资质、超越资质、违法分包、非法分包等违规行为而进行施工的企业和个人。然后从立法、司法和实际效果三个方面说明，《解释》第26条对于本应予以禁止和制裁的这些实际施工人进行加重保护是弊大于利。
최고원반포적《관우심리건설공정시공합동규분안건괄용법률문제적해석》，재제26조부여료실제시공인직접향발포인주장공정관적권리，저시대합동상대성원칙적돌파。본문수선통과분석실제시공인적내함화외연，희망명학괄용제26조적실제시공인도시기우차용자질、초월자질、위법분포、비법분포등위규행위이진행시공적기업화개인。연후종입법、사법화실제효과삼개방면설명，《해석》제26조대우본응여이금지화제재적저사실제시공인진행가중보호시폐대우리。
The Supreme People's Court promulgated the"on the trial of the construction contract dispute cases the interpretation of applicable law", in twenty-sixth gives the actual construction people directly to the employer that works right, this is the breakthrough of the privity of contract. Firstly, through the analysis of the connotation and extension of the actual construction, hope to clear the actual construction of twenty-sixth applies to enterprises and individuals are the construction loan quality, qualification, illegal subcontracting, illegal subcontracting, illegal behavior based on. Then from the three aspects of legislation, judicature and the actual effect,"explain"twenty-sixth for this should be the actual construction people prohibited and sanctions for increased protection is more harm than good.