CAJ | 학술논문

目的：利用扩展性线性支出法测定2008年陕西省城乡贫困线。方法：扩展性线性支出法。结果： ELES法在数据的易获得程度和操作简便程度、贫困人口享有经济社会发展程度、政府可接受程度等方面均优于官方贫困线。从ELES贫困线水平来看，农村居民贫困脆弱性更高，而我国官方贫困线水平较低，不利于反映实际的贫困状况。结论：采用相对贫困内涵以及合适的测量贫困的标准，把农村扶贫作为主要工作，并扩展和完善城乡社会保障体系来巩固扶贫成就。
목적：이용확전성선성지출법측정2008년합서성성향빈곤선。방법：확전성선성지출법。결과： ELES법재수거적역획득정도화조작간편정도、빈곤인구향유경제사회발전정도、정부가접수정도등방면균우우관방빈곤선。종ELES빈곤선수평래간，농촌거민빈곤취약성경고，이아국관방빈곤선수평교저，불리우반영실제적빈곤상황。결론：채용상대빈곤내함이급합괄적측량빈곤적표준，파농촌부빈작위주요공작，병확전화완선성향사회보장체계래공고부빈성취。
Objective:Using extended liner expenditure system(ELES) method to estimate the urban and rural poverty line of Shaanxi in 2008. Methods: The ELES method. Results: Compared with the government poverty line, the ELES method is easier to receive and handle, the poor groups have higher level of economic social development and the government has higher level of receivable level. According to the level of ELES poverty level, the poor vulnerability of rural residents is higher while the official poverty line is too low to reflect the reality. Conclusion: Adopting the concept of relative poverty and appropriate standards to measure poverty, taking rural poverty alleviation as the main work, expanding and implementing urban and rural social security system to consolidate the achievement of poverty alleviation.