CAJ | 학술논문

以攻击性词和中性词为刺激材料，采用情绪Stroop范式，考察不同电子游戏使用者对攻击性相关刺激的注意加工特性。结果发现，暴力电子游戏组对攻击性词的反应时显著长于非暴力电子游戏组，但两组被试对中性词的反应时没有显著差异；暴力电子游戏组对攻击性词的反应时要显著长于中性词，而非暴力电子游戏组对两类词的反应时差异不显著；在暴力电子游戏组中，高低攻击特质被试对攻击性词的反应时都显著长于中性词，而在非暴力电子游戏组中，高攻击特质被试和低攻击特质被试对两类词的反应时差异不显著。结果表明，暴力电子游戏组被试对攻击性词存在明显的注意偏向。
이공격성사화중성사위자격재료，채용정서Stroop범식，고찰불동전자유희사용자대공격성상관자격적주의가공특성。결과발현，폭력전자유희조대공격성사적반응시현저장우비폭력전자유희조，단량조피시대중성사적반응시몰유현저차이；폭력전자유희조대공격성사적반응시요현저장우중성사，이비폭력전자유희조대량류사적반응시차이불현저；재폭력전자유희조중，고저공격특질피시대공격성사적반응시도현저장우중성사，이재비폭력전자유희조중，고공격특질피시화저공격특질피시대량류사적반응시차이불현저。결과표명，폭력전자유희조피시대공격성사존재명현적주의편향。
The study adopted the aggressive and neutral vocabulary as stimulus material, and through the emotion Stroop paradigm,to examine the attention bias towards aggression-related cues forviolent and nonviolent video-game users. The results indicated that the RT of violent-game group response to aggressive words were significantly longer than the nonviolent-game group,but the two groups were no significant differences in the neutral vocabulary. Violent-game group re-sponse to aggressive words were significantly longer than neutral ones,and nonviolent-game group's response to two classes of words,no significant difference. In violent-game group,the subjects with high and low aggressive characteristics are al-ways try to react to offensive word significantly longer than neutral ones,however,in nonviolent-game group,there were no significant difference when the subjects response to the two classes of words. The results showed that there was obvious attention bias for the participants of violent video-game group to aggressive words.