东南大学学报(医学版)
東南大學學報(醫學版)
동남대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
5期
550-554
,共5页
噪声%甲苯%职业性听力损伤%Meta分析
譟聲%甲苯%職業性聽力損傷%Meta分析
조성%갑분%직업성은력손상%Meta분석
noise%toluene%occupational hearing loss%Meta-analysis
目的:用Meta分析方法探讨同时接触噪声及甲苯两种因素与单种因素暴露相比对劳动者职业性听力损伤的影响。方法:利用中国学术期刊全文数据库、万方全文数据库、Medline及Pubmed数据库检索国内外公开发表的从1990年1月至2013年12月的所有关于联合接触噪声及甲苯与职业性听力损伤关系的中英文文献;利用随机效应模型计算纳入文献的合并OR值及其95%CI 值;进行亚组分析探究异质性来源并分析出版偏倚。结果:纳入分析的文献共8篇(中文2篇,英文6篇)。经Meta分析,与单纯噪声暴露及单纯甲苯暴露相比,同时接触噪声和甲苯的高频听力损伤发生率分别增加1.98倍(95%CI:1.20~3.25)及2.48倍(95%CI:1.09~5.65)。亚组分析显示研究有显著异质性,但无明显发表偏倚。结论:同时接触甲苯会加重噪声作业场所劳动者高频听力损伤的发生率。
目的:用Meta分析方法探討同時接觸譟聲及甲苯兩種因素與單種因素暴露相比對勞動者職業性聽力損傷的影響。方法:利用中國學術期刊全文數據庫、萬方全文數據庫、Medline及Pubmed數據庫檢索國內外公開髮錶的從1990年1月至2013年12月的所有關于聯閤接觸譟聲及甲苯與職業性聽力損傷關繫的中英文文獻;利用隨機效應模型計算納入文獻的閤併OR值及其95%CI 值;進行亞組分析探究異質性來源併分析齣版偏倚。結果:納入分析的文獻共8篇(中文2篇,英文6篇)。經Meta分析,與單純譟聲暴露及單純甲苯暴露相比,同時接觸譟聲和甲苯的高頻聽力損傷髮生率分彆增加1.98倍(95%CI:1.20~3.25)及2.48倍(95%CI:1.09~5.65)。亞組分析顯示研究有顯著異質性,但無明顯髮錶偏倚。結論:同時接觸甲苯會加重譟聲作業場所勞動者高頻聽力損傷的髮生率。
목적:용Meta분석방법탐토동시접촉조성급갑분량충인소여단충인소폭로상비대노동자직업성은력손상적영향。방법:이용중국학술기간전문수거고、만방전문수거고、Medline급Pubmed수거고검색국내외공개발표적종1990년1월지2013년12월적소유관우연합접촉조성급갑분여직업성은력손상관계적중영문문헌;이용수궤효응모형계산납입문헌적합병OR치급기95%CI 치;진행아조분석탐구이질성래원병분석출판편의。결과:납입분석적문헌공8편(중문2편,영문6편)。경Meta분석,여단순조성폭로급단순갑분폭로상비,동시접촉조성화갑분적고빈은력손상발생솔분별증가1.98배(95%CI:1.20~3.25)급2.48배(95%CI:1.09~5.65)。아조분석현시연구유현저이질성,단무명현발표편의。결론:동시접촉갑분회가중조성작업장소노동자고빈은력손상적발생솔。
Objective:To assess the occupational hearing loss effects of workers between noise plus toluene group and one factor only group by Meta-analysis .Methods:Original English and Chinese articles on association between combined exposure of noise and toluene and occupational hearing loss (Jan.1990 to Dec.2013) were retrieved by such databases as Chinese CNKI , Wanfang , Medline and Pubmed .A random effect model was used to calculate pooled OR and their corresponding 95% CI.Potential sources of heterogeneity among studies were explored and publication bias was evaluated .Results: A total of 8 ( 2 in Chinese and 6 in English ) observational studies were identified.The prevalence rate of high frequency hearing loss in combined exposure group was higher than that in noise-only group and in toluene-only group, with pooled OR=1.98(95% CI:1.20-3.25) and 2.48(95% CI:1 .09-5 .65 ) ,respectively .The significant heterogeneity was found in subgroup analysis and publication bias was not significant among recruited studies .Conclusion:The results suggest that toluene exposure in noisy working places can exacerbate high frequency hearing loss in workers .