激光杂志
激光雜誌
격광잡지
LASER JOURNAL
2014年
9期
125-126
,共2页
氦氖激光%暴露疗法%抗生素软膏%肛周感染%患儿
氦氖激光%暴露療法%抗生素軟膏%肛週感染%患兒
양내격광%폭로요법%항생소연고%항주감염%환인
目的：观察氦氖激光联合肛周暴露疗法、保持清洁干燥、涂擦抗生素软膏治疗肛周感染的疗效和安全性。方法：将80例白血病患儿化疗后肛周感染患者随机分为试验组与对照组各40例。对照组给予全身使用抗生素、暴露疗法、肛周局部保持清洁干燥、局部途擦抗生素软膏（常规治疗），试验组例患儿在同对照组治疗方法同时加用氦氖激光局部照射治疗，治疗时间均为7天，两组均治疗2个疗程，观察两组治疗后疗效恢复情况，并将结果进行统计学比较。结果：试验组和对照组的总有效率分别是97.5%和72.5%，有极显著差（p<0.01）；患儿肛周红肿消退时间、皮肤完整性恢复时间、肛周疼痛恢复时间等方面试验组显著短于对照组（P﹤0.05）结论：氦氖激光联合全身使用抗生素、肛周暴露疗法、保持清洁干燥、涂擦抗生素软膏治疗肛周感染见效快.无疼痛、易操作、有效率高，在临床上值得推广。
目的：觀察氦氖激光聯閤肛週暴露療法、保持清潔榦燥、塗抆抗生素軟膏治療肛週感染的療效和安全性。方法：將80例白血病患兒化療後肛週感染患者隨機分為試驗組與對照組各40例。對照組給予全身使用抗生素、暴露療法、肛週跼部保持清潔榦燥、跼部途抆抗生素軟膏（常規治療），試驗組例患兒在同對照組治療方法同時加用氦氖激光跼部照射治療，治療時間均為7天，兩組均治療2箇療程，觀察兩組治療後療效恢複情況，併將結果進行統計學比較。結果：試驗組和對照組的總有效率分彆是97.5%和72.5%，有極顯著差（p<0.01）；患兒肛週紅腫消退時間、皮膚完整性恢複時間、肛週疼痛恢複時間等方麵試驗組顯著短于對照組（P﹤0.05）結論：氦氖激光聯閤全身使用抗生素、肛週暴露療法、保持清潔榦燥、塗抆抗生素軟膏治療肛週感染見效快.無疼痛、易操作、有效率高，在臨床上值得推廣。
목적：관찰양내격광연합항주폭로요법、보지청길간조、도찰항생소연고치료항주감염적료효화안전성。방법：장80례백혈병환인화료후항주감염환자수궤분위시험조여대조조각40례。대조조급여전신사용항생소、폭로요법、항주국부보지청길간조、국부도찰항생소연고（상규치료），시험조례환인재동대조조치료방법동시가용양내격광국부조사치료，치료시간균위7천，량조균치료2개료정，관찰량조치료후료효회복정황，병장결과진행통계학비교。결과：시험조화대조조적총유효솔분별시97.5%화72.5%，유겁현저차（p<0.01）；환인항주홍종소퇴시간、피부완정성회복시간、항주동통회복시간등방면시험조현저단우대조조（P﹤0.05）결론：양내격광연합전신사용항생소、항주폭로요법、보지청길간조、도찰항생소연고치료항주감염견효쾌.무동통、역조작、유효솔고，재림상상치득추엄。
Objective:To observe the safety and efficacy of the He-Ne laser therapy combined with traditional therapy such as perianal exposure, clean keeping and Neosporin rubbing. Method:80 patients with perianal infection were divided into trial group and control group randomly and 40 patients were included in each group. Control group of patients were treated with traditional therapy with perianal exposure, clean keeping and Neosporin rubbing while the treatment for trial group combined with He-Ne laser therapy. The recovery of perianal skin were observed during the two-course treatment in 7 days and the results were compared with statistical analysis. Result:The total efficacy of trial and control group was 97.5%and 72.5%respectively and this difference was statistically extremely signifi-cant (p<0.01). Time of swelling subsiding, skin integrity recovery and pain relieve of anal skin was significantly short in patients in trial group (p<0.05). Conclusion:Traditional therapy combined with He-Ne laser treatment was ef-ficiency, painless and easy to operate which made this combined therapy worth promoting in anal infection treatment.
