放射学实践
放射學實踐
방사학실천
RADIOLOGIC PRACTICE
2014年
9期
1072-1074
,共3页
巴图尔·吐尔地%王辉%火忠
巴圖爾·吐爾地%王輝%火忠
파도이·토이지%왕휘%화충
X 线数字体层融合技术%放射摄影术%尿路结石
X 線數字體層融閤技術%放射攝影術%尿路結石
X 선수자체층융합기술%방사섭영술%뇨로결석
Digital DT synthesis%Radiography%Urinary calculi
_目的:通过与普通泌尿系平片(KUB)的对照,探讨数字化体层融合技术(DTS)在泌尿系结石诊断中的价值。方法:对73例临床疑诊泌尿系结石患者,均行 KUB 摄片和 DTS 成像,检查结果经手术证实。对 KUB 与 DTS 成像诊断泌尿系结石的敏感度、特异度进行比较并做统计学分析。结果:61例疑诊患者被证实为泌尿系结石,余12例正常。KUB确诊32例,DTS 成像确诊55例。KUB、DTS 成像诊断敏感度分别为52.5.0%(32/61)、90.2%(55/61),特异度分别为66.7%(8/12)、83.3%(10/12)。统计学分析显示,KUB、DTS 成像术前诊断泌尿系结石与手术金标准比较,两种检查方法的诊断符合率差异有统计学意义(χ2=21.195,P 值=0.001)。结论:DTS 成像技术可显著提高泌尿系结石的定性诊断符合率,可作为诊断该病的常规影像检查方法。
_目的:通過與普通泌尿繫平片(KUB)的對照,探討數字化體層融閤技術(DTS)在泌尿繫結石診斷中的價值。方法:對73例臨床疑診泌尿繫結石患者,均行 KUB 攝片和 DTS 成像,檢查結果經手術證實。對 KUB 與 DTS 成像診斷泌尿繫結石的敏感度、特異度進行比較併做統計學分析。結果:61例疑診患者被證實為泌尿繫結石,餘12例正常。KUB確診32例,DTS 成像確診55例。KUB、DTS 成像診斷敏感度分彆為52.5.0%(32/61)、90.2%(55/61),特異度分彆為66.7%(8/12)、83.3%(10/12)。統計學分析顯示,KUB、DTS 成像術前診斷泌尿繫結石與手術金標準比較,兩種檢查方法的診斷符閤率差異有統計學意義(χ2=21.195,P 值=0.001)。結論:DTS 成像技術可顯著提高泌尿繫結石的定性診斷符閤率,可作為診斷該病的常規影像檢查方法。
_목적:통과여보통비뇨계평편(KUB)적대조,탐토수자화체층융합기술(DTS)재비뇨계결석진단중적개치。방법:대73례림상의진비뇨계결석환자,균행 KUB 섭편화 DTS 성상,검사결과경수술증실。대 KUB 여 DTS 성상진단비뇨계결석적민감도、특이도진행비교병주통계학분석。결과:61례의진환자피증실위비뇨계결석,여12례정상。KUB학진32례,DTS 성상학진55례。KUB、DTS 성상진단민감도분별위52.5.0%(32/61)、90.2%(55/61),특이도분별위66.7%(8/12)、83.3%(10/12)。통계학분석현시,KUB、DTS 성상술전진단비뇨계결석여수술금표준비교,량충검사방법적진단부합솔차이유통계학의의(χ2=21.195,P 치=0.001)。결론:DTS 성상기술가현저제고비뇨계결석적정성진단부합솔,가작위진단해병적상규영상검사방법。
To contrastively evaluate the clinical application value of X-ray digital synthesis (DTS)with conventional plain radiography of kidney,ureter and bladder (KUB)in the diagnosis of urinary calculi.Methods:73 patients with suspected urinary calculi who underwent both KUB and DTS exams were studied.All diagnoses were verified by oper-ations.Chi-squared test was applied to evaluate the difference of sensitivity and specificity between the two methods. Results:61 cases were proved to have urinary calculi,while other 12 cases were normal.Among those who were proved by operations,32 cases were diagnosed by KUB,55 cases by DTS.The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of KUB and DTS were 52.5% (32/61),90.2% (55/61),66.7% (8/12)and 83.3 (10/12),respectively.There was significant difference be-tween KUB and DTS (χ2 =21.195,P=0.001).Conclusion:DTS is a better method than KUB in diagnosing urinary calculi and can be used as a routine imaging technique in diagnosis and follow-up exam.