心电与循环
心電與循環
심전여순배
Journal of Electrocardiology(China)
2013年
6期
483-485
,共3页
李芳%罗玉寅%孙启银%柳元化
李芳%囉玉寅%孫啟銀%柳元化
리방%라옥인%손계은%류원화
房室结折返性心动过速%射频消融%电生理检查
房室結摺返性心動過速%射頻消融%電生理檢查
방실결절반성심동과속%사빈소융%전생리검사
Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia%Ablation%Electrophysiological test
目的观察无A-H 间期跳跃和不能诱发的房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)慢径路消融特点和远期疗效。方法经电生理检查证实无旁道参与的阵发性室上性心动过速患者100例,分成三组:能诱发AVNRT,有明显跳跃(A 组,n=40);不能诱发AVNRT,但有A-H间期>50ms 的明显跳跃(B组,n=40);不能诱发AVNRT 且没有A-H 间期>50ms 的明显跳跃(C 组,n=20)。比较术后各组电生理数值及消融远期疗效。结果与消融术前相比,术后各组患者的房室结顺传文氏周期均延长(P<0.05);消融术后房室结顺传有效不应期较术前缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组均出现缓慢交接区心律。术后随访12个月,各组复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论无A-H 间期跳跃且程控刺激不能诱发的AVNRT 的慢径路消融是安全有效的。缓慢交接区心律是消融有效的标志。
目的觀察無A-H 間期跳躍和不能誘髮的房室結摺返性心動過速(AVNRT)慢徑路消融特點和遠期療效。方法經電生理檢查證實無徬道參與的陣髮性室上性心動過速患者100例,分成三組:能誘髮AVNRT,有明顯跳躍(A 組,n=40);不能誘髮AVNRT,但有A-H間期>50ms 的明顯跳躍(B組,n=40);不能誘髮AVNRT 且沒有A-H 間期>50ms 的明顯跳躍(C 組,n=20)。比較術後各組電生理數值及消融遠期療效。結果與消融術前相比,術後各組患者的房室結順傳文氏週期均延長(P<0.05);消融術後房室結順傳有效不應期較術前縮短,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);三組均齣現緩慢交接區心律。術後隨訪12箇月,各組複髮率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論無A-H 間期跳躍且程控刺激不能誘髮的AVNRT 的慢徑路消融是安全有效的。緩慢交接區心律是消融有效的標誌。
목적관찰무A-H 간기도약화불능유발적방실결절반성심동과속(AVNRT)만경로소융특점화원기료효。방법경전생리검사증실무방도삼여적진발성실상성심동과속환자100례,분성삼조:능유발AVNRT,유명현도약(A 조,n=40);불능유발AVNRT,단유A-H간기>50ms 적명현도약(B조,n=40);불능유발AVNRT 차몰유A-H 간기>50ms 적명현도약(C 조,n=20)。비교술후각조전생리수치급소융원기료효。결과여소융술전상비,술후각조환자적방실결순전문씨주기균연장(P<0.05);소융술후방실결순전유효불응기교술전축단,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);삼조균출현완만교접구심률。술후수방12개월,각조복발솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론무A-H 간기도약차정공자격불능유발적AVNRT 적만경로소융시안전유효적。완만교접구심률시소융유효적표지。
Objective To assess features of slow pathway ablation and long-term efficacy of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT) without AH jump and tachycardia onset during programmed stimulation. Methods Based on electrophysiological test results, 100 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and no bypass pathway were divided into group A, AH jump followed by AVNRT onset(n=40), group B, AH jump but no AVNRT(n=40 ), and group C, no AH jump and no ANVRT (n=20). Electrophysiological parameters and long-term efficacy were compared between groups. Results AV nodal antegrade conduction Wenckebach periods were prolonged significantly in all patients after ablation(P<0.05). The effective refractory period of AV node shortened significantly after ablation(P<0.05). Junctional rhythmappeared during ablation in all patients. The recurrence rate was similar in all groups during follow-up 12 months. Conclusion Slow pathway ablation is safe and effective for AVNRT without AH jump and inducible tachycardia during programmed stimulation. Junctional rhythmis a marker of effective ablation.