南通大学学报(医学版)
南通大學學報(醫學版)
남통대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF NANTONG UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCES)
2013年
6期
471-474
,共4页
叶文学%郁喆%华菲%陈柯%胡雁秋%卜丽芬%沈振亚
葉文學%鬱喆%華菲%陳柯%鬍雁鞦%蔔麗芬%瀋振亞
협문학%욱철%화비%진가%호안추%복려분%침진아
微创心脏外科%体外循环%小切口
微創心髒外科%體外循環%小切口
미창심장외과%체외순배%소절구
minimally invasive cardiac surgery%cardiopulmonary bypass%mini-incision
目的:总结分析右胸前外侧微创小切口行心脏手术的临床经验,探讨其临床意义。方法:对我科2012年1月-2013年3月期间56例实施了直视微创心脏手术患者资料进行分析。其手术径路为经右胸前外侧第4肋间切口,采用股动脉、股静脉建立体外循环,经右房切口实施房室缺修补术、经房间沟或右房切口实施瓣膜置换手术,术后评估手术效果。并与行常规正中开胸心脏手术25例患者进行比较。结果:微创手术组有5例患者因体形肥胖术野暴露困难而延长手术切口;3例有右侧胸腔黏连,予游离胸膜腔后继续心脏手术;其余患者手术过程较顺利,均获成功,无死亡患者。其平均手术时间为(183.5±65.2) min,平均体外循环时间为(59.2±21.5) min,心脏停跳患者平均升主动脉阻断时间(44.3±24.6) min,术后呼吸机辅助平均机械通气时间(7.0±3.1) h,术后24 h平均胸腔积液引流量(289.4±117.2) mL,平均住院时间(10.5±4.2) d,未见严重手术并发症发生。微创手术组和常规手术组两组间患者体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间和呼吸机辅助呼吸时间以及住院总费用方面差异无统计学意义,微创手术组较常规手术组总手术时间略长但术后胸管引流量明显减少、住院时间明显缩短。结论:右胸前外侧小切口直视下可完成微创径路房室缺修补和二尖瓣瓣膜置换术,对患者生理及心理创伤小,安全易行。与传统手术相比,微创手术患者术后康复期短,切口美观,在适用范围内值得临床广泛推广和应用。
目的:總結分析右胸前外側微創小切口行心髒手術的臨床經驗,探討其臨床意義。方法:對我科2012年1月-2013年3月期間56例實施瞭直視微創心髒手術患者資料進行分析。其手術徑路為經右胸前外側第4肋間切口,採用股動脈、股靜脈建立體外循環,經右房切口實施房室缺脩補術、經房間溝或右房切口實施瓣膜置換手術,術後評估手術效果。併與行常規正中開胸心髒手術25例患者進行比較。結果:微創手術組有5例患者因體形肥胖術野暴露睏難而延長手術切口;3例有右側胸腔黏連,予遊離胸膜腔後繼續心髒手術;其餘患者手術過程較順利,均穫成功,無死亡患者。其平均手術時間為(183.5±65.2) min,平均體外循環時間為(59.2±21.5) min,心髒停跳患者平均升主動脈阻斷時間(44.3±24.6) min,術後呼吸機輔助平均機械通氣時間(7.0±3.1) h,術後24 h平均胸腔積液引流量(289.4±117.2) mL,平均住院時間(10.5±4.2) d,未見嚴重手術併髮癥髮生。微創手術組和常規手術組兩組間患者體外循環時間、主動脈阻斷時間和呼吸機輔助呼吸時間以及住院總費用方麵差異無統計學意義,微創手術組較常規手術組總手術時間略長但術後胸管引流量明顯減少、住院時間明顯縮短。結論:右胸前外側小切口直視下可完成微創徑路房室缺脩補和二尖瓣瓣膜置換術,對患者生理及心理創傷小,安全易行。與傳統手術相比,微創手術患者術後康複期短,切口美觀,在適用範圍內值得臨床廣汎推廣和應用。
목적:총결분석우흉전외측미창소절구행심장수술적림상경험,탐토기림상의의。방법:대아과2012년1월-2013년3월기간56례실시료직시미창심장수술환자자료진행분석。기수술경로위경우흉전외측제4륵간절구,채용고동맥、고정맥건입체외순배,경우방절구실시방실결수보술、경방간구혹우방절구실시판막치환수술,술후평고수술효과。병여행상규정중개흉심장수술25례환자진행비교。결과:미창수술조유5례환자인체형비반술야폭로곤난이연장수술절구;3례유우측흉강점련,여유리흉막강후계속심장수술;기여환자수술과정교순리,균획성공,무사망환자。기평균수술시간위(183.5±65.2) min,평균체외순배시간위(59.2±21.5) min,심장정도환자평균승주동맥조단시간(44.3±24.6) min,술후호흡궤보조평균궤계통기시간(7.0±3.1) h,술후24 h평균흉강적액인류량(289.4±117.2) mL,평균주원시간(10.5±4.2) d,미견엄중수술병발증발생。미창수술조화상규수술조량조간환자체외순배시간、주동맥조단시간화호흡궤보조호흡시간이급주원총비용방면차이무통계학의의,미창수술조교상규수술조총수술시간략장단술후흉관인류량명현감소、주원시간명현축단。결론:우흉전외측소절구직시하가완성미창경로방실결수보화이첨판판막치환술,대환자생리급심리창상소,안전역행。여전통수술상비,미창수술환자술후강복기단,절구미관,재괄용범위내치득림상엄범추엄화응용。
Objective: To review and summarize the experience of minimally invasive cardiac surgery(MICS) in 56 patients via right minithoracotomy. Methods: From January 2012 to March 2013, 56 patients with cardiac disease, including arterial septal defect(ASD), ventricular septal defect(VSD), mitral insufficiency(MI) and mitral stenosis(MS), were enrolled and underwent MICS. Surgical access was through a right anterolateral thoracotomy in the forth intercostal space. A main surgical wound was made over the lateral border of the right breast. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established via femoral cannulation. The procedures of mitral valve replacement were performed via interatrial groove or right atrium , while both ASD and VSD via right atrium. 25 patients with cardiac disease, including ASD, VSD, Mitral Insufficiency(MI) and MS, were also enrolled and underwent cardiac surgery procedures. Surgical accesses of these patients were through median sternotomy for operation. Results:All the operations were successful and all the patients were cured and discharged in the minimally invasive operation group. Mean operation, cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamp times were (183.5±65.2) min, (59.2±21.5) min and (44.3± 24.6) min respectively. The mean postoperative ventilation time was (7.0±3.1) h. The mean total chest tube drainage in the first day post-operation was (289.4±117.2) mL, and mean length of hospital stay were (10.5±4.2) d. Cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic clamping time, ventilation time and total cost of hospitalization were not statistically significant between minimally invasive operation group and routine operation group. Total operation time was slightly longer in minimally invasive operation group than conventional operation group, but postoperative chest tube drainage volume significantly reduced, and hospitalization time was shortened obviously. Conclusion: MICS through a right anterolateral thoracotomy but without thoracoscopic-assisted is safe and feasible. It makes good cosmetic results and rapid postoperative recovery , and shortens length of hospital stay. MICS is worthy of widely clinical elective application.