CAJ | 학술논문

目的：了解欧洲五维健康量表（EQ-5D）和六维度健康调查简表（SF-6D）之间的差异及适用范围，以期为我国药物经济学评价成本-效用分析中测量的工具选择及使用提供参考。方法：通过对该两量表进行比较研究，从维度结构、信息性、偏好估算方法、效用值计算公式和量表的可操作性进行对比分析。结果：两量表具有差异性及重叠性。结论： SF-6D在较为温和的疾病中，对活力影响较高容易使人疲惫的疾病中可能较为适用，调查对象最好具备一定的文化及理解能力。 EQ-5D在较差的健康状态中可能较为适用且操作容易。
목적：료해구주오유건강량표（EQ-5D）화륙유도건강조사간표（SF-6D）지간적차이급괄용범위，이기위아국약물경제학평개성본-효용분석중측량적공구선택급사용제공삼고。방법：통과대해량량표진행비교연구，종유도결구、신식성、편호고산방법、효용치계산공식화량표적가조작성진행대비분석。결과：량량표구유차이성급중첩성。결론： SF-6D재교위온화적질병중，대활력영향교고용역사인피비적질병중가능교위괄용，조사대상최호구비일정적문화급리해능력。 EQ-5D재교차적건강상태중가능교위괄용차조작용역。
Objective: To understand the differences and ranges between EuroQol-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) and ShortForm6D(SF-6D) so as to provide the references of economic evaluation in selection and application of measures. Methods:A comparison of the two scales was processed from the descriptive content, sensitivity, valuation methods, scoring algorithms and feasibility. Results: EQ-5D and SF-6D have differences and overlapping. Conclusion: SF-6D is appropriate for milder diseases, especially for the disease has a higher impact on the vitality, however, because of complexity of SF-36, the interviewee may to be educated and have comprehensive ability. EQ-5D is appropriate for poor or serious diseases, and it is easy to operate.