CAJ | 학술논문

批评语言学认为,任何语言运用都具有意识形态意义。随着人们对语言和意识形态关系的深入研究,越来越多的人开始使用批评语篇分析的手法来分析媒体语篇的语言特征。从语言学的角度,运用批评语篇分析手法对比分析China Daily和The New York Times关于玉树地震的报道,从词汇分类、转换、情态系统三方面探讨这两家媒体对于该事件报道中的语言运用的差异以及产生原因,可以揭示中西方媒体所蕴含的不同意识形态。
비평어언학인위,임하어언운용도구유의식형태의의。수착인문대어언화의식형태관계적심입연구,월래월다적인개시사용비평어편분석적수법래분석매체어편적어언특정。종어언학적각도,운용비평어편분석수법대비분석China Daily화The New York Times관우옥수지진적보도,종사회분류、전환、정태계통삼방면탐토저량가매체대우해사건보도중적어언운용적차이이급산생원인,가이게시중서방매체소온함적불동의식형태。
Critical linguists view that ideology is hidden in every form of languages. As the studies of languages and ideology deepen, more and more people begin to analyze the linguistic features of news discourses from the perspective of critical discourse analysis. The present paper makes a contrastive analysis between China Daily and The New York Times＇ news reports on the Yushu earthquake. With critical analysis, this paper tries to find out the differences and the reasons by examining their lexical classification, transformation and modality. In this way, the different ideologies can be disclosed.