CAJ | 학술논문

谈保护临终病患这一弱势群体的权益，则安乐死不可回避，而谈安乐死，宪法学当首先明确态度。可以说，任何研究安乐死的法学学者都无法回避安乐死的合法性论证问题。而欲论证安乐死的合法性．则合宪性分析毋庸置疑应居其首，宪法不可能对安乐死采取熟视无睹或简单否定的鸵鸟政策。因此，将安乐死置于宪法环境下，以宪法角度切入，以宪法学基本权利有关理论为剖析工具。导衍出现行宪政秩序下如何定位安乐死争议问题在规范解决上的腹地，或能为我们提供思考指引。见另一番天地。
담보호림종병환저일약세군체적권익，칙안악사불가회피，이담안악사，헌법학당수선명학태도。가이설，임하연구안악사적법학학자도무법회피안악사적합법성론증문제。이욕론증안악사적합법성．칙합헌성분석무용치의응거기수，헌법불가능대안악사채취숙시무도혹간단부정적타조정책。인차，장안악사치우헌법배경하，이헌법각도절입，이헌법학기본권리유관이론위부석공구。도연출현행헌정질서하여하정위안악사쟁의문제재규범해결상적복지，혹능위아문제공사고지인。견령일번천지。
As to protecting a dying patient＇s rights and interests, it is necessary to talk about Euthanasia, while talking about Euthanasia, the constitutional law should first show a clear attitude, which can not be avoided. In order to prove whether it is legal or not, the analysis of its constitutionality should be no doubt about in their first. The constitution could not neglect it and simply take Ostrich Policy. It is supposed to research Euthanasia under the constitutional environment, take the basic constitutional rights as analysis tools, and solve the dispute under the constitutional order, which may provide some thinking guidelines for us.