中外健康文摘
中外健康文摘
중외건강문적
WORLD HEALTH DIGEST
2014年
18期
36-37
,共2页
动静并治法%缺血性脑病%疗效观察
動靜併治法%缺血性腦病%療效觀察
동정병치법%결혈성뇌병%료효관찰
movement and governing law%ischemic encephalopathy%the clinical results
目的：对动静并治法治疗缺血性脑病的临床效果进行探讨及分析，为以后的治疗提供治疗依据。方法：抽取在我院2012年至2013年进行治疗的缺血性脑病患者80例，并随机的分为观察组与对照组，每组各40例，并观察组患者采用动静并治法进行治疗，而对照组患者则采用常规的方法进行治疗，然后将得到的两组患者的疗后效果进行对比。结果：通过对80例患者采用了不同的方法进行治疗后，发现观察组40例患者恢复的有34例，总有效率为85%；对照组40例患者中显效的有26例，总有效率为65%，可以看出采用动静并治法治疗的观察组患者的恢复效果明显由于采用常规方法治疗的对照组患者，两组的数据有明显的差异（P<0.05），有统计学意义。结论：通过分析发现采用动静并治法治疗缺血性脑病患者的临床效果明显优于采用常规方法治疗的对照组患者，缺血性患者经济动静并治法进行治疗，多数患者得到了良好的恢复，这说明采用动静并治法治疗缺血性脑病患者有着较为显著的临床效果，具有较高的临床价值，值得在临床治疗中推广使用。
目的：對動靜併治法治療缺血性腦病的臨床效果進行探討及分析，為以後的治療提供治療依據。方法：抽取在我院2012年至2013年進行治療的缺血性腦病患者80例，併隨機的分為觀察組與對照組，每組各40例，併觀察組患者採用動靜併治法進行治療，而對照組患者則採用常規的方法進行治療，然後將得到的兩組患者的療後效果進行對比。結果：通過對80例患者採用瞭不同的方法進行治療後，髮現觀察組40例患者恢複的有34例，總有效率為85%；對照組40例患者中顯效的有26例，總有效率為65%，可以看齣採用動靜併治法治療的觀察組患者的恢複效果明顯由于採用常規方法治療的對照組患者，兩組的數據有明顯的差異（P<0.05），有統計學意義。結論：通過分析髮現採用動靜併治法治療缺血性腦病患者的臨床效果明顯優于採用常規方法治療的對照組患者，缺血性患者經濟動靜併治法進行治療，多數患者得到瞭良好的恢複，這說明採用動靜併治法治療缺血性腦病患者有著較為顯著的臨床效果，具有較高的臨床價值，值得在臨床治療中推廣使用。
목적：대동정병치법치료결혈성뇌병적림상효과진행탐토급분석，위이후적치료제공치료의거。방법：추취재아원2012년지2013년진행치료적결혈성뇌병환자80례，병수궤적분위관찰조여대조조，매조각40례，병관찰조환자채용동정병치법진행치료，이대조조환자칙채용상규적방법진행치료，연후장득도적량조환자적료후효과진행대비。결과：통과대80례환자채용료불동적방법진행치료후，발현관찰조40례환자회복적유34례，총유효솔위85%；대조조40례환자중현효적유26례，총유효솔위65%，가이간출채용동정병치법치료적관찰조환자적회복효과명현유우채용상규방법치료적대조조환자，량조적수거유명현적차이（P<0.05），유통계학의의。결론：통과분석발현채용동정병치법치료결혈성뇌병환자적림상효과명현우우채용상규방법치료적대조조환자，결혈성환자경제동정병치법진행치료，다수환자득도료량호적회복，저설명채용동정병치법치료결혈성뇌병환자유착교위현저적림상효과，구유교고적림상개치，치득재림상치료중추엄사용。
Objective: Treatment of movement and treatment of ischemic encephalopathy explore and analyze clinical results provide the basis for future therapeutic treatment . Extraction method in patients with ischemic encephalopathy in our hospital from 2012 to 2013 for treatment of 80 cases were randomly divided into observation group and control group , 40 cases in each group and the observation group were treated with movement and therapies for treatment, while the control group of patients is treated by a conventional method , and the effects of the treatment were obtained in the two groups were compared. Results: 80 patients were treated with a different approach after treatment, 40 patients in the observation group was found to restore the 34 cases, total effective rate was 85% ; control group of 40 patients, 26 cases markedly , the total efficiency 65% , we can see that the use of movement and significantly thanks to conventional therapy in patients in the control group , there are two sets of data recovery effects observed in patients treated for therapeutic significant differences (P <0.05), there are statisticaly significant. Conclusions: The analysis revealed that the use of movement and therapies to treat ischemic encephalopathy in patients with clinicaly significant effect of treatment than patients in the control group using conventional methods of treatment, patients with ischemic economic activity and therapies , most patients get a good recovery , indicating that the use of movement and therapies to treat ischemic encephalopathy in patients with more significant clinical effect, with a high clinical value and should be introduced in the clinical treatment .
