CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比分析七氟醚与丙泊酚用于小儿烧伤手术麻醉的维持效果。方法：收集我院2012年6月-2013年6月期间诊治的烧伤患儿58例作为研究对象，采用随机分组的方式将患者分为观察组与对照组，每组患者各29例。观察组采用七氟醚维持麻醉，对照组采用丙泊酚维持麻醉，对两组患者的临床效果进行分析对比。结果：研究结果显示，两组患儿均无苏醒期呕吐情况发生，观察组患儿的定向力恢复时间、自主呼吸恢复时间、拔管时间、苏醒时间均明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论：七氟醚用于小儿烧伤手术麻醉的维持效果优于丙泊酚，值得在临床应用上推广。
목적：대비분석칠불미여병박분용우소인소상수술마취적유지효과。방법：수집아원2012년6월-2013년6월기간진치적소상환인58례작위연구대상，채용수궤분조적방식장환자분위관찰조여대조조，매조환자각29례。관찰조채용칠불미유지마취，대조조채용병박분유지마취，대량조환자적림상효과진행분석대비。결과：연구결과현시，량조환인균무소성기구토정황발생，관찰조환인적정향력회복시간、자주호흡회복시간、발관시간、소성시간균명현저우대조조(P<0.05)。결론：칠불미용우소인소상수술마취적유지효과우우병박분，치득재림상응용상추엄。
objective: to analysis of sevoflurane and propofol for pediatric burn the maintenance of anesthesia effect. Methods: col ected from June 2012 - June 2013 during the diagnosis and treatment of burn patients 58 cases as the research object, adopt the way of randomized patients divided into observation group and control group, patients in each group (n= 29). Sevoflurane maintain anesthesia, the observation group with the control group maintain anesthesia with propofol, to analyze the clinical effect of two groups of patients. Results:the results showed that both groups of children without waking vomiting happens, observation group of the patient's orientation force recovery time, spontaneous breathing recovery time and extubation time, waking time were significantly lower than control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: sevoflurane for pediatric burn to maintain the effect is better than that of propofol anesthesia, is worth popularization in clinical application.