医学信息
醫學信息
의학신식
MEDICAL INFORMATION
2014年
27期
40-40
,共1页
以传统授课为基础的教学法%以问题为导向的教学法%心血管内科
以傳統授課為基礎的教學法%以問題為導嚮的教學法%心血管內科
이전통수과위기출적교학법%이문제위도향적교학법%심혈관내과
Problem-based-learning%Lecture-based-learning%Cardiology
目的比较问题为向导的教学法(Problem-based learning,PBL)与以授课为基础的单向教学法(1ecture-based leaming,LBL)在中西医结合心血管内科临床教学的应用效果。方法选择2012年6月~2013年6月在新疆医科大学附属中医医院实习的128名五年制中西医结合临床医学本科实习医师,随机分为PBL教学组(n=63)和LBL教学组(n=65)；分别用PBL与LBL教学法进行中西医结合心血管内科临床教学,教学结束后通过专业考试及问卷调查等方法,对两种教学方法的效果进行比较。结果PBL教学方法组成绩明显高于LBL教学法,两组之间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。结论在中西医结合心血管内科临床教学中,PBL教学法能帮助学生更快的发现问题,分析问题和解决问题。
目的比較問題為嚮導的教學法(Problem-based learning,PBL)與以授課為基礎的單嚮教學法(1ecture-based leaming,LBL)在中西醫結閤心血管內科臨床教學的應用效果。方法選擇2012年6月~2013年6月在新疆醫科大學附屬中醫醫院實習的128名五年製中西醫結閤臨床醫學本科實習醫師,隨機分為PBL教學組(n=63)和LBL教學組(n=65)；分彆用PBL與LBL教學法進行中西醫結閤心血管內科臨床教學,教學結束後通過專業攷試及問捲調查等方法,對兩種教學方法的效果進行比較。結果PBL教學方法組成績明顯高于LBL教學法,兩組之間差異有統計學意義(<0.05)。結論在中西醫結閤心血管內科臨床教學中,PBL教學法能幫助學生更快的髮現問題,分析問題和解決問題。
목적비교문제위향도적교학법(Problem-based learning,PBL)여이수과위기출적단향교학법(1ecture-based leaming,LBL)재중서의결합심혈관내과림상교학적응용효과。방법선택2012년6월~2013년6월재신강의과대학부속중의의원실습적128명오년제중서의결합림상의학본과실습의사,수궤분위PBL교학조(n=63)화LBL교학조(n=65)；분별용PBL여LBL교학법진행중서의결합심혈관내과림상교학,교학결속후통과전업고시급문권조사등방법,대량충교학방법적효과진행비교。결과PBL교학방법조성적명현고우LBL교학법,량조지간차이유통계학의의(<0.05)。결론재중서의결합심혈관내과림상교학중,PBL교학법능방조학생경쾌적발현문제,분석문제화해결문제。
Objective To compare the plication of problem-based learning and lecture-based learning in clinical teaching of Integrative Cardiovascular Disease.Methods 128 cardiovascular medical interns of Traditional Chinese Mdeical Hospital XinJiang Uygur Autonomous Region were selected.They were divided randomly into the PBL group (n=63)and the LBL group (n=65)and received PBL or the LBL teaching method.Teaching ef ects were evaluated by examination and questionnaire. Results The average score and the fine rate of teaching effectiveness in PBL group are significantly higher than that of LBL group. Conclusion The teaching ef ectiveness of PBL is bet er than that of LBL, and PBL should be extensively applied in clinical teaching of Integrative Cardiovascular Disease.
