CAJ | 학술논문

陈平原的《中国散文小说史》和顾彬的《中国文学史?中国古典散文》都设有欧阳修散文论的章节。两家所言实际上反映出古代散文研究的两种普遍存在的突出倾向，即一是从研究现代散文的经验出发来研究古代散文；一是从西方美文的观念出发来研究中国古代散文。前者看重古代散文中和现代散文面目相似的作品；后者径直以所谓边缘性、附带性、分散性、私秘性作为中国古代散文的特性。这些似乎都有悖于从古代散文创作实际、批评实际出发研究古代散文的基本原则，因而，所得结论未必尽能深中肯綮。
진평원적《중국산문소설사》화고빈적《중국문학사?중국고전산문》도설유구양수산문론적장절。량가소언실제상반영출고대산문연구적량충보편존재적돌출경향，즉일시종연구현대산문적경험출발래연구고대산문；일시종서방미문적관념출발래연구중국고대산문。전자간중고대산문중화현대산문면목상사적작품；후자경직이소위변연성、부대성、분산성、사비성작위중국고대산문적특성。저사사호도유패우종고대산문창작실제、비평실제출발연구고대산문적기본원칙，인이，소득결론미필진능심중긍계。
There are chapters of Ou Yangxiu's prose theory in CHEN Ping-yuan’s Chinese prose fiction History and Gu Bin’s Chinese Literature History.Chinese Classical Prose. These two books reflect two tendencies in ancient prose studies in China. One is that studying ancient prose from the experiences of studying modern prose and another is that studying ancient prose from the aspect of studying western prose. The former value the similarities in the ancient prose and modern prose. The latter labels the ancient prose in China with features of marginalization, adherence, dispersion and secrecy. Both of the two tendencies seem to be against the basic principles of studying Chinese ancient prose from the aspect of creation and criticism of reality. Therefore, the conclusion they have reached may not quite to the point.