西南军医
西南軍醫
서남군의
JOURNAL OF MILITARY SURGEON IN SOUTHWEST CHINA
2013年
6期
601-603
,共3页
何春阳%吴帆%付西%邓韩彬%蒙俊甫%刘毅%呼永河
何春暘%吳帆%付西%鄧韓彬%矇俊甫%劉毅%呼永河
하춘양%오범%부서%산한빈%몽준보%류의%호영하
高压氧%治疗压力%颅脑外伤%格拉斯哥昏迷评分
高壓氧%治療壓力%顱腦外傷%格拉斯哥昏迷評分
고압양%치료압력%로뇌외상%격랍사가혼미평분
hyperbaric oxygen (HBO)%therapeutic pressure%cerebral trauma%Glasgow coma score (GCS)
目的:观察不同压力高压氧(HBO)对颅脑外伤术后昏迷患者的早期疗效。方法按入组先后顺序随机将75例颅脑外伤术后昏迷患者分为对照组、0.20MPa高压氧组(HBO1组)和0.25MPa高压氧组(HBO2组),每组25例,比较三组患者在术后1周内和术后1月的格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS),以及出院前的治愈显效率。结果(1)三组患者在术后1周内GCS评分无统计学差异(P>0.05),但治疗1月后GCS评分均提高(P<0.05)。(2)治疗后HBO1组和HBO2组GCS评分明显高于对照组,且HBO2组评分高于HBO1组(P<0.05)。(3) HBO1组和HBO2组的治愈显效率(76%和80%)明显高于对照组(48%)(P<0.05),但HBO1组和HBO2组之间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论早期两种压力的HBO治疗对颅脑外伤术后昏迷患者的恢复均有良好促进作用,其中0.25MPa压力的HBO对患者的促醒作用可能更优。
目的:觀察不同壓力高壓氧(HBO)對顱腦外傷術後昏迷患者的早期療效。方法按入組先後順序隨機將75例顱腦外傷術後昏迷患者分為對照組、0.20MPa高壓氧組(HBO1組)和0.25MPa高壓氧組(HBO2組),每組25例,比較三組患者在術後1週內和術後1月的格拉斯哥昏迷評分(GCS),以及齣院前的治愈顯效率。結果(1)三組患者在術後1週內GCS評分無統計學差異(P>0.05),但治療1月後GCS評分均提高(P<0.05)。(2)治療後HBO1組和HBO2組GCS評分明顯高于對照組,且HBO2組評分高于HBO1組(P<0.05)。(3) HBO1組和HBO2組的治愈顯效率(76%和80%)明顯高于對照組(48%)(P<0.05),但HBO1組和HBO2組之間無統計學差異(P>0.05)。結論早期兩種壓力的HBO治療對顱腦外傷術後昏迷患者的恢複均有良好促進作用,其中0.25MPa壓力的HBO對患者的促醒作用可能更優。
목적:관찰불동압력고압양(HBO)대로뇌외상술후혼미환자적조기료효。방법안입조선후순서수궤장75례로뇌외상술후혼미환자분위대조조、0.20MPa고압양조(HBO1조)화0.25MPa고압양조(HBO2조),매조25례,비교삼조환자재술후1주내화술후1월적격랍사가혼미평분(GCS),이급출원전적치유현효솔。결과(1)삼조환자재술후1주내GCS평분무통계학차이(P>0.05),단치료1월후GCS평분균제고(P<0.05)。(2)치료후HBO1조화HBO2조GCS평분명현고우대조조,차HBO2조평분고우HBO1조(P<0.05)。(3) HBO1조화HBO2조적치유현효솔(76%화80%)명현고우대조조(48%)(P<0.05),단HBO1조화HBO2조지간무통계학차이(P>0.05)。결론조기량충압력적HBO치료대로뇌외상술후혼미환자적회복균유량호촉진작용,기중0.25MPa압력적HBO대환자적촉성작용가능경우。
Objective To observe the curative effect of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) at different pressure as the early treatment on post-operative coma of patients with cerebral trauma. Methods 75 cases with cerebral trauma suffering from post-operative coma were randomly divided into 3 groups:HBO group 1 (at 0.20MPa),HBO group 2 (at 0.25MPa) and control group,25 in each;a comparative study was made to the Glasgow coma scores (GCS) of the patients in the 3 groups at 1 week and at 1 month after operation,as well as to the cured and obvious effective rate before discharge. Results There existed no statistical difference among the GCS at 1 week after operation of the patients in the 3 groups (P>0.05) while their scores all increased at 1 month after operation (P<0.05);the scores of HBO group 1 and HBO group 2 were both higher than that of control group after treatment,and the scores of HBO group 2 were higher than that of HBO group 1 (P<0.05);the obvious effective rates of HBO group 1 and HBO group 2 (76%and 80%) were significantly higher than that of control group (48%) (P<0.05) while no statistical difference was found between the rates of HBO group 1 and HBO group 2 (P>0.05). Conclusions Early treatment of HBO at two different pressures is of good effect on the recovery of patients with cerebral trau-ma suffering from post-operative coma,and HBO treatment at the pressure of 0.25MPa may be of more superior effect.