农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2014年
1期
183-190
,共8页
刘宁%李新举%郭斌%闵祥羽
劉寧%李新舉%郭斌%閔祥羽
류저%리신거%곽빈%민상우
土地复垦%土壤%压实%复垦机械%影响因素
土地複墾%土壤%壓實%複墾機械%影響因素
토지복은%토양%압실%복은궤계%영향인소
land reclamation%soils%compaction%reclamation machinery%influencing factors
机械碾压造成的土壤压实是土地复垦中面临的主要问题之一,影响土壤压实程度的因素很多,除土壤自身的因素以外,还包括压实机械、压实次数以及土层厚度等。该文基于统计学的理论,采用2×5×4的混合试验设计并建立模拟实验区,使用重锤模拟分析了2种压实机械、不同压实次数(1、3、5、7、9次)和不同土层厚度(0~10cm、>10~20cm、>20~30cm、>30~40 cm)上土壤紧实度的变化情况,并在SPSS中进行变量的方差分析和多重比较,试图找到机械压实过程中影响土壤紧实度的因素及其变化水平。结果表明:增加压实机械的承重轮面积能够有效降低对土壤的压实作用;压实机械、土层厚度和压实次数都是影响土壤紧实度的显著性因素且各因素的贡献率(97%)远高于随机误差;自卸汽车在第5次压实之后就已经使上层土壤紧实度达到最大值,而履带式推土机需要压实7次,土地复垦中应尽量选择履带型机械,碾压次数控制在5~7之内;机械压实的过程中,各土层厚度之间土壤紧实度的大小关系并不是一成不变的,中间层次(>10~30 cm)的土壤由于同时受到来自上下2个方向的作用力,紧实度相对较高;不同次数的压实对土壤紧实度的影响深度和程度不同,在一定范围内,随着压实次数的增加,单次压实对土壤紧实度的影响逐渐减小。
機械碾壓造成的土壤壓實是土地複墾中麵臨的主要問題之一,影響土壤壓實程度的因素很多,除土壤自身的因素以外,還包括壓實機械、壓實次數以及土層厚度等。該文基于統計學的理論,採用2×5×4的混閤試驗設計併建立模擬實驗區,使用重錘模擬分析瞭2種壓實機械、不同壓實次數(1、3、5、7、9次)和不同土層厚度(0~10cm、>10~20cm、>20~30cm、>30~40 cm)上土壤緊實度的變化情況,併在SPSS中進行變量的方差分析和多重比較,試圖找到機械壓實過程中影響土壤緊實度的因素及其變化水平。結果錶明:增加壓實機械的承重輪麵積能夠有效降低對土壤的壓實作用;壓實機械、土層厚度和壓實次數都是影響土壤緊實度的顯著性因素且各因素的貢獻率(97%)遠高于隨機誤差;自卸汽車在第5次壓實之後就已經使上層土壤緊實度達到最大值,而履帶式推土機需要壓實7次,土地複墾中應儘量選擇履帶型機械,碾壓次數控製在5~7之內;機械壓實的過程中,各土層厚度之間土壤緊實度的大小關繫併不是一成不變的,中間層次(>10~30 cm)的土壤由于同時受到來自上下2箇方嚮的作用力,緊實度相對較高;不同次數的壓實對土壤緊實度的影響深度和程度不同,在一定範圍內,隨著壓實次數的增加,單次壓實對土壤緊實度的影響逐漸減小。
궤계년압조성적토양압실시토지복은중면림적주요문제지일,영향토양압실정도적인소흔다,제토양자신적인소이외,환포괄압실궤계、압실차수이급토층후도등。해문기우통계학적이론,채용2×5×4적혼합시험설계병건립모의실험구,사용중추모의분석료2충압실궤계、불동압실차수(1、3、5、7、9차)화불동토층후도(0~10cm、>10~20cm、>20~30cm、>30~40 cm)상토양긴실도적변화정황,병재SPSS중진행변량적방차분석화다중비교,시도조도궤계압실과정중영향토양긴실도적인소급기변화수평。결과표명:증가압실궤계적승중륜면적능구유효강저대토양적압실작용;압실궤계、토층후도화압실차수도시영향토양긴실도적현저성인소차각인소적공헌솔(97%)원고우수궤오차;자사기차재제5차압실지후취이경사상층토양긴실도체도최대치,이리대식추토궤수요압실7차,토지복은중응진량선택리대형궤계,년압차수공제재5~7지내;궤계압실적과정중,각토층후도지간토양긴실도적대소관계병불시일성불변적,중간층차(>10~30 cm)적토양유우동시수도래자상하2개방향적작용력,긴실도상대교고;불동차수적압실대토양긴실도적영향심도화정도불동,재일정범위내,수착압실차수적증가,단차압실대토양긴실도적영향축점감소。
Soil compaction resulted from mechanical rolling is one of the major problems in land reclamation. There are a lot of factors that influence soil compaction apart from soil properties, and also mechanical pressure, soil layer, and times of compaction etc. Based on the statistical theory, this article focused on a 2×5×4 mixed experimental design and established a simulation experimental area that employed a heavy punch to simulate the two compact machineries for respectively once, three times, five times, seven times, and nine times. Each fall depth for every compact punch on the soil would be measured. Afterwards, the soil compaction gauge was used to measure the soil compaction changes in different layers. At last, variance analysis in SPSS was conducted and a comparison of random pairs, with the intention of finding influential factors of soil density in the mechanical compaction process and the varied range and preconditions of each factor. The results derived were as follows:(1) A size increase of the compact machinery roller wheels can effectively reduce mechanical compaction on the soil. Since the ground contact area was relatively small when the wheel dumper ran, soil compaction was increasingly seriously affected in the land reclamation process. In the process of machinery compaction, soil fall depth reflects the soil compaction degree, to some extent, and can serve common farmland cultivation as one of the indicators for a preliminary judgment on soil compaction. (2) Compact machinery, soil layer, and times of compaction are all notable factors influencing soil compaction, all of whose contribution rate is highly above random error. The interactive effect, especially between the compact machinery and times of compaction, had a remarkable and profound effect on soil compaction. (3) Different compact machineries of varied weights and ground contact areas would lead to different compaction effects. The dump truck crushed down into 30cm on the upper layer and realized the maximum compaction after five times of compaction, while the crawler dozer needed seven times for the same outcome. (4) In the process of machinery compaction, the soil compaction in different layers did not remain the same. When the soil was less compacted, the upper layer would experience a skyrocketing soil compaction, and the compaction degree declines in a deeper layer. When times of compaction are increased, the soil compaction difference between each layer narrows. The mid-layer (>20-30cm) features a comparatively high compaction under upward and downward stress. (5) The times of machinery compaction had a remarkable effect on soil compaction. Five times of dump truck compaction and seven times of crawler dozer compaction generally achieve the same compaction degree in comparative soil. In addition, the physical property of soil was severely destroyed, which resulted in soil clay or hardening. Therefore, the type of construction machinery and times of compaction must be controlled in land reclamation. (6) Different compaction times had different depth influences and degrees on soil compaction. Initial compaction is most obvious on soil compaction. Single compaction effect on soil compaction will be gradually reduced when the times of compaction are increased in a certain range. A continuous increase of compaction times enforces lower layer compaction though, yet crawls slowly upward. Repeated single compaction of small pressure on soil indeed cannot be ignored. (7) Models were establish built on correlations between soil compaction and press, times of compaction, and soil layer to judge rough soil compaction under different conditions. In addition, improvement measures for land reclamation are defined as the next research focus.