中国康复理论与实践
中國康複理論與實踐
중국강복이론여실천
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION THEORY & PRACTICE
2014年
6期
592-596
,共5页
徐艳文%罗筱媛%卢讯文%Chow S.Lam
徐豔文%囉篠媛%盧訊文%Chow S.Lam
서염문%라소원%로신문%Chow S.Lam
阶段转变模型%受伤工人%重返工作岗位%职业康复
階段轉變模型%受傷工人%重返工作崗位%職業康複
계단전변모형%수상공인%중반공작강위%직업강복
stage of change model%injured workers%return to work%vocational rehabilitation
目的:测量林氏就业准备量表(LASER)普通话版本的信度和效度。同时观察重返工作岗位信心对于不同就业准备阶段的影响。方法共85例四肢骨折的受伤工人参与本次研究。资料收集主要通过面谈的方式获得。信度测试包括重测信度和内部一致性测试。效度检验主要通过因子分析方法解释结构效度。重返工作岗位信心对于不同阶段受伤工人就业准备的影响采用方差分析。结果主成分分析法提取到4个因子。重测组内相关系数(ICC)为0.27~0.89,而4个阶段的内部一致性为0.691~0.796。重返工作岗位信心的强弱与不同准备阶段有较大的关系。结论 LASER普通话版本的结构效度能反映受伤工人重返工作岗位的准备过程。部分条目信度较低,该版本需要在进一步修改后才能使用。
目的:測量林氏就業準備量錶(LASER)普通話版本的信度和效度。同時觀察重返工作崗位信心對于不同就業準備階段的影響。方法共85例四肢骨摺的受傷工人參與本次研究。資料收集主要通過麵談的方式穫得。信度測試包括重測信度和內部一緻性測試。效度檢驗主要通過因子分析方法解釋結構效度。重返工作崗位信心對于不同階段受傷工人就業準備的影響採用方差分析。結果主成分分析法提取到4箇因子。重測組內相關繫數(ICC)為0.27~0.89,而4箇階段的內部一緻性為0.691~0.796。重返工作崗位信心的彊弱與不同準備階段有較大的關繫。結論 LASER普通話版本的結構效度能反映受傷工人重返工作崗位的準備過程。部分條目信度較低,該版本需要在進一步脩改後纔能使用。
목적:측량림씨취업준비량표(LASER)보통화판본적신도화효도。동시관찰중반공작강위신심대우불동취업준비계단적영향。방법공85례사지골절적수상공인삼여본차연구。자료수집주요통과면담적방식획득。신도측시포괄중측신도화내부일치성측시。효도검험주요통과인자분석방법해석결구효도。중반공작강위신심대우불동계단수상공인취업준비적영향채용방차분석。결과주성분분석법제취도4개인자。중측조내상관계수(ICC)위0.27~0.89,이4개계단적내부일치성위0.691~0.796。중반공작강위신심적강약여불동준비계단유교대적관계。결론 LASER보통화판본적결구효도능반영수상공인중반공작강위적준비과정。부분조목신도교저,해판본수요재진일보수개후재능사용。
Objective To measure the reliability and validity of the Lam Assessment of Stages of Employment Readiness (LASER) Put-onghua version for injured workers, and observe the confidence of return to work on different preparation stages. Methods 85 injured work-ers with limb fractures were included. The data was obtained through face-to-face structured interview. The test-retest reliability and internal consistency were measured. Factor analysis was used to examine construct validity of the Putonghua version LASER. Results Principle component analysis extracted four factors, which was consistent with the original version of LASER. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of test-retest ranged 0.27~0.89, whereas the internal consistence among these 4 stages ranged 0.691~0.796. There were significantly differences in confident scores in different stages among 3 different confidence groups. Conclusion The structure validity of Putonghua ver-sion of LASER is useful for reflecting the readiness of injured workers' return to work. However, the reliability coefficient is rather low in some of the items, which could be resulted in incorrect judgment of readiness of return to work of injured workers. The further study on items correction and development is apparent.