中国康复理论与实践
中國康複理論與實踐
중국강복이론여실천
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION THEORY & PRACTICE
2014年
6期
576-579
,共4页
陈敏%张振贤%周展红%王晓静%张烨%吴丽丽
陳敏%張振賢%週展紅%王曉靜%張燁%吳麗麗
진민%장진현%주전홍%왕효정%장엽%오려려
慢性疲劳综合征%抑郁症%焦虑症%疲劳
慢性疲勞綜閤徵%抑鬱癥%焦慮癥%疲勞
만성피로종합정%억욱증%초필증%피로
chronic fatigue syndrome%depression%anxiety%fatigue
目的:分析研究慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)与轻中度抑郁症、焦虑症患者疲劳特征及抑郁、焦虑症状的差异。方法运用疲劳量表-14(FS-14)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)对182例CFS及轻中度抑郁症、焦虑症患者进行测评及统计分析。结果三组患者在躯体疲劳程度、精神疲劳程度及疲劳总分各方面均无显著性差异(P>0.05);CFS组患者可能有抑郁症状的患者为39例(62.9%),伴有轻中度抑郁症状的患者为23例(37.1%),未发现肯定没有抑郁症状的患者;CFS组患者可能有焦虑症状的46例(74.2%),肯定有焦虑症状的16例(25.8%),未发现肯定没有焦虑症状的患者;CFS组HAMD总分显著低于轻中度抑郁症组(P<0.001),两组在焦虑/躯体化、阻滞两因子中有非常显著性差异(P<0.01),在认识障碍、日夜变化、绝望感各因子中有显著性差异(P<0.05)。CFS组HAMA总分显著低于轻中度焦虑症组(P<0.001),两组在精神性焦虑方面有非常显著性差异(P<0.01),在躯体性焦虑各方有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论 CFS与轻中度抑郁症、焦虑症三组患者在临床中均表现为“郁”与“疲”的同时存在,在临床症状的表现上存在着一定的“相互重叠”现象。
目的:分析研究慢性疲勞綜閤徵(CFS)與輕中度抑鬱癥、焦慮癥患者疲勞特徵及抑鬱、焦慮癥狀的差異。方法運用疲勞量錶-14(FS-14)、漢密爾頓抑鬱量錶(HAMD)和漢密爾頓焦慮量錶(HAMA)對182例CFS及輕中度抑鬱癥、焦慮癥患者進行測評及統計分析。結果三組患者在軀體疲勞程度、精神疲勞程度及疲勞總分各方麵均無顯著性差異(P>0.05);CFS組患者可能有抑鬱癥狀的患者為39例(62.9%),伴有輕中度抑鬱癥狀的患者為23例(37.1%),未髮現肯定沒有抑鬱癥狀的患者;CFS組患者可能有焦慮癥狀的46例(74.2%),肯定有焦慮癥狀的16例(25.8%),未髮現肯定沒有焦慮癥狀的患者;CFS組HAMD總分顯著低于輕中度抑鬱癥組(P<0.001),兩組在焦慮/軀體化、阻滯兩因子中有非常顯著性差異(P<0.01),在認識障礙、日夜變化、絕望感各因子中有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。CFS組HAMA總分顯著低于輕中度焦慮癥組(P<0.001),兩組在精神性焦慮方麵有非常顯著性差異(P<0.01),在軀體性焦慮各方有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。結論 CFS與輕中度抑鬱癥、焦慮癥三組患者在臨床中均錶現為“鬱”與“疲”的同時存在,在臨床癥狀的錶現上存在著一定的“相互重疊”現象。
목적:분석연구만성피로종합정(CFS)여경중도억욱증、초필증환자피로특정급억욱、초필증상적차이。방법운용피로량표-14(FS-14)、한밀이돈억욱량표(HAMD)화한밀이돈초필량표(HAMA)대182례CFS급경중도억욱증、초필증환자진행측평급통계분석。결과삼조환자재구체피로정도、정신피로정도급피로총분각방면균무현저성차이(P>0.05);CFS조환자가능유억욱증상적환자위39례(62.9%),반유경중도억욱증상적환자위23례(37.1%),미발현긍정몰유억욱증상적환자;CFS조환자가능유초필증상적46례(74.2%),긍정유초필증상적16례(25.8%),미발현긍정몰유초필증상적환자;CFS조HAMD총분현저저우경중도억욱증조(P<0.001),량조재초필/구체화、조체량인자중유비상현저성차이(P<0.01),재인식장애、일야변화、절망감각인자중유현저성차이(P<0.05)。CFS조HAMA총분현저저우경중도초필증조(P<0.001),량조재정신성초필방면유비상현저성차이(P<0.01),재구체성초필각방유현저성차이(P<0.05)。결론 CFS여경중도억욱증、초필증삼조환자재림상중균표현위“욱”여“피”적동시존재,재림상증상적표현상존재착일정적“상호중첩”현상。
Objective To observe the difference among the patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), mild-to-moderate depression or anxiety disorders in symptoms of fatigue, depression and anxiety. Methods Fatigue Scale-14 (FS-14), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depres-sion (HAMD) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) were used to evaluate 182 cases with CFS, mild-to-moderate depression or anxiety disorders. Results There was no significant difference in physical fatigue, mental fatigue and comprehensive fatigue among 3 groups (P>0.05). There were 39 (62.9%) CFS patients perhaps with depression symptoms and 23 (37.1%) patients with mild-to-moderate de-pression symptoms. There were 46 (74.2%) CFS patients perhaps with anxiety symptoms and 16 (25.8%) patients with mild-to-moderate anxiety symptoms. The score of HAMD was significant lower in the CFS group than in the mild-to-moderate depression disorder group (P<0.001). There were significant differences in the anxiety/somatization and hysteresis (P<0.01), as well as in cognitive disturbance, diurnal variation and hopelessness (P<0.05) between the CFS group and mild-to-moderate depression disorder group. The scores of HAMA was sig-nificant lower in the CFS group than in the mild-to-moderate anxiety disorder group (P<0.001). There was significant difference in men-tal-anxiety (P<0.01), as well as in body-anxiety (P<0.05) between the CFS group and the mild-to-moderate anxiety disorder group. Conclu-sion The symptoms of emotion disorders and fatigue symptoms were both presented in patients with CFS, mild-to-moderate depression and anxiety disorders. They share common clinical features.