中国康复理论与实践
中國康複理論與實踐
중국강복이론여실천
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION THEORY & PRACTICE
2014年
6期
554-557
,共4页
刘剑%山磊%张小年%崔利华
劉劍%山磊%張小年%崔利華
류검%산뢰%장소년%최리화
脑卒中%蒙特利尔认知评估量表%认知障碍%康复
腦卒中%矇特利爾認知評估量錶%認知障礙%康複
뇌졸중%몽특리이인지평고량표%인지장애%강복
stroke%Montreal Cognitive Assessment%cognitive impairment%rehabilitation
目的:探讨脑卒中患者蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评分的特点,分析年龄、昏迷与否、损伤侧、损伤部位等因素对MoCA总分和各分项评分的影响。方法记录135例脑卒中患者一般资料,并使用MoCA进行评分,分析结果。结果患者在延迟回忆、抽象、语言、视空间与执行功能方面平均得分相对较低,而在命名、注意、定向方面得分相对较高。年龄较大患者与年龄较小患者在MoCA总分、注意、语言、延迟回忆和定向得分上有显著性差异(P<0.05)。发生昏迷的患者与未发生昏迷的患者在总分、视空间与执行功能、注意、定向等项目上得分有显著性差异(P<0.05)。病变侧在左侧的患者与在右侧的相比,总分、注意、语言、抽象和延迟回忆、定向得分上有显著性差异(P<0.05)。与基底节损伤相比,额叶损伤在总分、注意、抽象和延迟回忆得分上有显著性差异(P<0.05),额、颞、顶叶损伤在总分、命名、抽象和延迟回忆得分上有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论 MoCA可以在一定程度上反映脑卒中患者认知障碍的程度,年龄、是否发生昏迷、损伤病变侧和损伤部位会影响患者的认知障碍程度。
目的:探討腦卒中患者矇特利爾認知評估量錶(MoCA)評分的特點,分析年齡、昏迷與否、損傷側、損傷部位等因素對MoCA總分和各分項評分的影響。方法記錄135例腦卒中患者一般資料,併使用MoCA進行評分,分析結果。結果患者在延遲迴憶、抽象、語言、視空間與執行功能方麵平均得分相對較低,而在命名、註意、定嚮方麵得分相對較高。年齡較大患者與年齡較小患者在MoCA總分、註意、語言、延遲迴憶和定嚮得分上有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。髮生昏迷的患者與未髮生昏迷的患者在總分、視空間與執行功能、註意、定嚮等項目上得分有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。病變側在左側的患者與在右側的相比,總分、註意、語言、抽象和延遲迴憶、定嚮得分上有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。與基底節損傷相比,額葉損傷在總分、註意、抽象和延遲迴憶得分上有顯著性差異(P<0.05),額、顳、頂葉損傷在總分、命名、抽象和延遲迴憶得分上有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。結論 MoCA可以在一定程度上反映腦卒中患者認知障礙的程度,年齡、是否髮生昏迷、損傷病變側和損傷部位會影響患者的認知障礙程度。
목적:탐토뇌졸중환자몽특리이인지평고량표(MoCA)평분적특점,분석년령、혼미여부、손상측、손상부위등인소대MoCA총분화각분항평분적영향。방법기록135례뇌졸중환자일반자료,병사용MoCA진행평분,분석결과。결과환자재연지회억、추상、어언、시공간여집행공능방면평균득분상대교저,이재명명、주의、정향방면득분상대교고。년령교대환자여년령교소환자재MoCA총분、주의、어언、연지회억화정향득분상유현저성차이(P<0.05)。발생혼미적환자여미발생혼미적환자재총분、시공간여집행공능、주의、정향등항목상득분유현저성차이(P<0.05)。병변측재좌측적환자여재우측적상비,총분、주의、어언、추상화연지회억、정향득분상유현저성차이(P<0.05)。여기저절손상상비,액협손상재총분、주의、추상화연지회억득분상유현저성차이(P<0.05),액、섭、정협손상재총분、명명、추상화연지회억득분상유현저성차이(P<0.05)。결론 MoCA가이재일정정도상반영뇌졸중환자인지장애적정도,년령、시부발생혼미、손상병변측화손상부위회영향환자적인지장애정도。
Objective To investigate the characteristics of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and analyze the influence of age, co-ma or not, injury side, and injury area on the scores of MoCA. Methods 135 stroke patients were evaluated with MoCA. Results The scores were poor in delayed recalling, abstraction, verbal fluency, view space and executive function, and were less poor in naming, attention and orientation. There was significantly difference in the total score, attention, verbal fluency, delayed recalling and orientation of MoCA be-tween older and younger patients (P<0.05). There was significantly difference in the total score, view space and executive function, atten-tion, orientation between patients with coma and without coma (P<0.05). There was significantly difference in the total score, attention, ver-bal fluency, abstraction, delayed recalling and orientation between thoses with left side injury and right side injury (P<0.05). Compared with basal ganglia injury, front lobes injury tended to impact the total scores, attention, abstraction and delayed recalling (P<0.05);frontal, tempo-ral and parietal lobes tended to impact the total score, naming, abstraction and delayed recalling (P<0.05). Conclusion The total scores of MoCA do reflect the cognitive impairment in patients with stroke, while the age, coma or not, injury side and injury area of the brain may impact the cognitive impairment in patients.