中国环境科学
中國環境科學
중국배경과학
CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
2014年
6期
1614-1621
,共8页
王文军%傅崇辉%骆跃军%谢鹏程%赵黛青
王文軍%傅崇輝%駱躍軍%謝鵬程%趙黛青
왕문군%부숭휘%락약군%사붕정%조대청
中国碳排放权交易试点%管理效率评价%DEA模型
中國碳排放權交易試點%管理效率評價%DEA模型
중국탄배방권교역시점%관리효솔평개%DEA모형
Chinese pilot carbon emission trading systems%management efficiency evaluation%DEA model
以我国7个碳排放权交易机制试点地区的碳交易体系(ETS)和19个地区模拟ETS的设计方案、调研数据为基础,采用C2GS2模型作为基本工具构建数据包络分析模型(DEA)对碳交易机制的管理效率进行评价。结果显示,在7个试点地区中,北京、广东、深圳和重庆ETS机制的管理效率为DEA有效;上海和天津ETS处于规模递增阶段,湖北处于规模递减阶段,通过其在有效生产前沿面上的“投影”提出调整方案。建议:ETS 覆盖的碳排放量低于地区总排放量的50%;下调中国核证自愿减排量(CCER)的碳抵消比例;紧紧围绕机制所覆盖的企业特征,进行投入要素规模设计;惩罚机制必不可少,但惩罚力度需根据本地区ETS投入要素特点进行设计;对ETS的碳排放上限(减排率)不宜设计过紧,否则可能对地区经济可持续发展能力造成损害。
以我國7箇碳排放權交易機製試點地區的碳交易體繫(ETS)和19箇地區模擬ETS的設計方案、調研數據為基礎,採用C2GS2模型作為基本工具構建數據包絡分析模型(DEA)對碳交易機製的管理效率進行評價。結果顯示,在7箇試點地區中,北京、廣東、深圳和重慶ETS機製的管理效率為DEA有效;上海和天津ETS處于規模遞增階段,湖北處于規模遞減階段,通過其在有效生產前沿麵上的“投影”提齣調整方案。建議:ETS 覆蓋的碳排放量低于地區總排放量的50%;下調中國覈證自願減排量(CCER)的碳牴消比例;緊緊圍繞機製所覆蓋的企業特徵,進行投入要素規模設計;懲罰機製必不可少,但懲罰力度需根據本地區ETS投入要素特點進行設計;對ETS的碳排放上限(減排率)不宜設計過緊,否則可能對地區經濟可持續髮展能力造成損害。
이아국7개탄배방권교역궤제시점지구적탄교역체계(ETS)화19개지구모의ETS적설계방안、조연수거위기출,채용C2GS2모형작위기본공구구건수거포락분석모형(DEA)대탄교역궤제적관리효솔진행평개。결과현시,재7개시점지구중,북경、엄동、심수화중경ETS궤제적관리효솔위DEA유효;상해화천진ETS처우규모체증계단,호북처우규모체감계단,통과기재유효생산전연면상적“투영”제출조정방안。건의:ETS 복개적탄배방량저우지구총배방량적50%;하조중국핵증자원감배량(CCER)적탄저소비례;긴긴위요궤제소복개적기업특정,진행투입요소규모설계;징벌궤제필불가소,단징벌력도수근거본지구ETS투입요소특점진행설계;대ETS적탄배방상한(감배솔)불의설계과긴,부칙가능대지구경제가지속발전능력조성손해。
Based on the analysis of design proposals and survey data from seven Chinese pilot carbon emission trading systems (ETS) and simulation ETS of 19 regions, apply the C2GS2 model as the basic tools to build the data envelope analysis method (DEA) to evaluate the management efficiency of each ETS unit. The model assessment results showed that in the seven pilot ETS units, that of Beijing, Guangdong, Shenzhen and Chongqing are effective management under the DEA method, Shanghai ETS and Tianjin ETS are in the scale ascending stage, Hubei ETS is in the scale descending stage. For three non-DEA effective ETS units, their “efficient projections” on the production frontier surfaces were analyzed for proposing adjustment programs. This study suggests as follows: the coverage of ETS should be less than 50% of total regional emission;the proportion of CCER for compliance should be lowered;in-put factors of each ETS should reflect the feature of the regulated enterprises; punishment mechanism is essential and should be in accordance with violators’ bearing capacity;the emission cap of ETS should not be designed too tight, or it may damage sustainable development capability of regional economy.