实用药物与临床
實用藥物與臨床
실용약물여림상
PRACTICAL PHARMACY AND CLINICAL REMEDIES
2014年
6期
684-687
,共4页
阿加曲班%血液净化%肝素诱导血小板减少
阿加麯班%血液淨化%肝素誘導血小闆減少
아가곡반%혈액정화%간소유도혈소판감소
Argatroban%Blood purification%Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
目的:观察阿加曲班在有高危出血倾向和肝素诱导血小板减少( HIT)患者血液净化治疗中的抗凝疗效和安全性。方法在我院血液净化中心治疗的有出血倾向和HIT的患者36例,分为阿加曲班组(20例)和无肝素组(16例),对两组的疗效和安全性进行比较。结果两组患者在性别、年龄、原发病及血液净化方式上比较差异无统计学意义,与无肝素组相比,阿加曲班组的治疗时间延长,差异有统计学意义[(8.0±3.5) h vs (3.6±1.7)h,P<0.05],出血的发生率没有明显增加(5% vs 0,P>0.05),凝血发生率明显下降(10% vs 50%, P<0.05)。两组患者在治疗前的血红蛋白、血小板、白蛋白及血清肌酐水平及各项凝血指标相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与无肝素组相比,阿加曲班组治疗后血清肌酐明显下降[(312.9±171.8)μmol/L vs(455.1±289.3)μmol/L,P<0.05],PT、APTT及TT明显延长,纤维蛋白原(Fib)水平下降,其中APTT和TT延长差异有统计学意义[(46.3±28.4)s vs (30.5±6.2)s;(74.5±25.4)s vs(25±2.7)s,P<0.05]。结论阿加曲班作为一种新型抗凝剂应用于有出血风险、围手术及HIT的急慢性肾功能不全患者血液净化治疗是一种很好的选择。
目的:觀察阿加麯班在有高危齣血傾嚮和肝素誘導血小闆減少( HIT)患者血液淨化治療中的抗凝療效和安全性。方法在我院血液淨化中心治療的有齣血傾嚮和HIT的患者36例,分為阿加麯班組(20例)和無肝素組(16例),對兩組的療效和安全性進行比較。結果兩組患者在性彆、年齡、原髮病及血液淨化方式上比較差異無統計學意義,與無肝素組相比,阿加麯班組的治療時間延長,差異有統計學意義[(8.0±3.5) h vs (3.6±1.7)h,P<0.05],齣血的髮生率沒有明顯增加(5% vs 0,P>0.05),凝血髮生率明顯下降(10% vs 50%, P<0.05)。兩組患者在治療前的血紅蛋白、血小闆、白蛋白及血清肌酐水平及各項凝血指標相比,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。與無肝素組相比,阿加麯班組治療後血清肌酐明顯下降[(312.9±171.8)μmol/L vs(455.1±289.3)μmol/L,P<0.05],PT、APTT及TT明顯延長,纖維蛋白原(Fib)水平下降,其中APTT和TT延長差異有統計學意義[(46.3±28.4)s vs (30.5±6.2)s;(74.5±25.4)s vs(25±2.7)s,P<0.05]。結論阿加麯班作為一種新型抗凝劑應用于有齣血風險、圍手術及HIT的急慢性腎功能不全患者血液淨化治療是一種很好的選擇。
목적:관찰아가곡반재유고위출혈경향화간소유도혈소판감소( HIT)환자혈액정화치료중적항응료효화안전성。방법재아원혈액정화중심치료적유출혈경향화HIT적환자36례,분위아가곡반조(20례)화무간소조(16례),대량조적료효화안전성진행비교。결과량조환자재성별、년령、원발병급혈액정화방식상비교차이무통계학의의,여무간소조상비,아가곡반조적치료시간연장,차이유통계학의의[(8.0±3.5) h vs (3.6±1.7)h,P<0.05],출혈적발생솔몰유명현증가(5% vs 0,P>0.05),응혈발생솔명현하강(10% vs 50%, P<0.05)。량조환자재치료전적혈홍단백、혈소판、백단백급혈청기항수평급각항응혈지표상비,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。여무간소조상비,아가곡반조치료후혈청기항명현하강[(312.9±171.8)μmol/L vs(455.1±289.3)μmol/L,P<0.05],PT、APTT급TT명현연장,섬유단백원(Fib)수평하강,기중APTT화TT연장차이유통계학의의[(46.3±28.4)s vs (30.5±6.2)s;(74.5±25.4)s vs(25±2.7)s,P<0.05]。결론아가곡반작위일충신형항응제응용우유출혈풍험、위수술급HIT적급만성신공능불전환자혈액정화치료시일충흔호적선택。
Objective To observe the anticoagulation efficacy and safety of argatroban in blood purification treatment of patients with high risk of bleeding or heparin-induced thrombocytopedia(HIT). Methods Patients with bleeding tendency or HIT in our blood purification centre were divided into argatroban group(20 cases) and non-hepa-rin group(16 cases). The efficacy and safety of the two groups were compared. Results There was no difference in terms of gender,age,primary disease and blood purification pattern in the two groups. Compared with the non-heparin group,the treatment time in argatroban group was prolonged significantly [ ( 8. 0 ± 3. 5 ) h vs ( 3. 6 ± 1. 7 ) h, P <0. 05],the incidence of bleeding in argatroban group did not significantly increased(5% vs 0,P>0. 05),while the in-cidence of coagulation significantly decreased (10% vs 50%,P<0. 05). There was no difference in serum hemoglo-bin,albumin and creatinine level,platelet account and coagulation index in two groups before treatment. Compared with non-heparin group,the serum creatinine levels in argatroban group decreased significantly after treatment [ ( 312. 9 ± 171. 8)μmol/L vs (455. 1 ± 289. 3)μmol/L,P<0. 05]. PT,APTT and TT were prolonged,the fibrinogen level de-creased,APTT and TT were prolonged significantly[(46.3 ±28.4)s vs (30.5 ±6.2)s,P<0.05;(74.5 ±25.4)s vs (25 ± 2. 7)s,P<0. 05]. Conclusion Argatroban as a new type of anticoagulant could be served as a good choice for blood purification therapy for those who has risk of bleeding,HIT,or perioperative conditions.