海南大学学报（人文社会科学版）
海南大學學報（人文社會科學版）
해남대학학보（인문사회과학판）
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES JOURNAL OF HAINAN UNIVERSITY
2013年
6期
85-89
,共5页
破产和解制度%监督机制%转换机制
破產和解製度%鑑督機製%轉換機製
파산화해제도%감독궤제%전환궤제
bankruptcy reconciliation system%supervisory mechanism%shift mechanism
破产和解制度作为破产企业再建型程序之一，与破产重整制度、破产清算制度并列为企业破产法律制度中的三大支柱性制度。然而，自中国现行企业破产法实施以来，破产和解制度尚未发挥出其应有的功能，直接导致了破产和解制度在法律价值、制度规范与司法实践之间的分离。有鉴于此，在肯定破产和解制度法律价值的前提下，有必要对破产和解制度的制度规范进行深度反思，进一步改进破产和解制度的监督机制，并创设破产和解制度与破产重整制度、破产清算制度之间的转换机制，以增强破产和解制度在司法实践中的可接受度与可操作性，从而真正确保破产和解制度在法律价值、制度规范与司法实践上的统一。
破產和解製度作為破產企業再建型程序之一，與破產重整製度、破產清算製度併列為企業破產法律製度中的三大支柱性製度。然而，自中國現行企業破產法實施以來，破產和解製度尚未髮揮齣其應有的功能，直接導緻瞭破產和解製度在法律價值、製度規範與司法實踐之間的分離。有鑒于此，在肯定破產和解製度法律價值的前提下，有必要對破產和解製度的製度規範進行深度反思，進一步改進破產和解製度的鑑督機製，併創設破產和解製度與破產重整製度、破產清算製度之間的轉換機製，以增彊破產和解製度在司法實踐中的可接受度與可操作性，從而真正確保破產和解製度在法律價值、製度規範與司法實踐上的統一。
파산화해제도작위파산기업재건형정서지일，여파산중정제도、파산청산제도병렬위기업파산법률제도중적삼대지주성제도。연이，자중국현행기업파산법실시이래，파산화해제도상미발휘출기응유적공능，직접도치료파산화해제도재법률개치、제도규범여사법실천지간적분리。유감우차，재긍정파산화해제도법률개치적전제하，유필요대파산화해제도적제도규범진행심도반사，진일보개진파산화해제도적감독궤제，병창설파산화해제도여파산중정제도、파산청산제도지간적전환궤제，이증강파산화해제도재사법실천중적가접수도여가조작성，종이진정학보파산화해제도재법률개치、제도규범여사법실천상적통일。
The bankruptcy reconciliation as one of the procedures for the reconstruction of the bankrupt enter-prise, along with the bankruptcy re-organization and bankruptcy liquidation, is regarded as the three pillar sys-tems. However, since China’ s current bankruptcy law was put into effect, the bankruptcy reconciliation system hasn’ t exerted its function, directly resulting in the separation of bankruptcy reconciliation system among the law value, legal norm and judicial practice. Therefore, under the premise of affirming the law value of bankruptcy reconciliation system, it is necessary to thoroughly reflect on its legal norm so as to further improve its superviso-ry mechanism. Meantime it is suggested to create the shift mechanism between the bankruptcy reconciliation sys-tem and the bankruptcy re-organization system as well as bankruptcy liquidation system in order to strengthen its acceptability and operability in the judicial practice, really ensuring the unity of its law value, legal norm and ju-dicial practice.
