CAJ | 학술논문

针对赣江全流域及18个子流域，在日和月时间尺度上分别进行GR模型与三水源新安江模型、两参数月水量平衡模型的比较。结果表明：在所选择的研究流域， GR模型在率定期和检验期的确定性系数达到0.85以上，径流总量相对误差在依10%以内；GR日模型的精度略高于新安江模型，具有更强的稳定性，且结构简易，参数不确定性较低；GR月模型的精度及模型复杂性与两参数月水量平衡模型相当。
침대공강전류역급18개자류역，재일화월시간척도상분별진행GR모형여삼수원신안강모형、량삼수월수량평형모형적비교。결과표명：재소선택적연구류역， GR모형재솔정기화검험기적학정성계수체도0.85이상，경류총량상대오차재의10%이내；GR일모형적정도략고우신안강모형，구유경강적은정성，차결구간역，삼수불학정성교저；GR월모형적정도급모형복잡성여량삼수월수량평형모형상당。
A comparative study was conducted on the Mode ' le du ge ' nie rural ( GR ) model, the Xin ’ anjiang ( XAJ) model, and a water balance model with double parameters ( WBM-DP) at daily and monthly time-scales in the Ganjiang River Basin and 18 sub-catchments. The results show that, in the study areas, the coefficient of determination of the GR model exceeded 0. 85 and the relative error of the total runoff volume was within ±10%during the calibration and validation periods. At the daily time-scale, the GR model had slightly higher accuracy than the XAJ model, and it had greater stability, a simpler structure, and less uncertainty with regard to parameters. At the monthly time-scale, the accuracy and complexity of the GR model were consistent with those of the WBM-DP model.