日语学习与研究
日語學習與研究
일어학습여연구
NIHONGO NO GAKUSHU TO KENKYU
2014年
5期
121-127
,共7页
森鸥外%舞姬%现代自我%明治时代
森鷗外%舞姬%現代自我%明治時代
삼구외%무희%현대자아%명치시대
Mori Ogai%Maihime%Modern Ego%Meiji-era
森鸥外所著《舞姬》在日本文学现代化转型过程中具有重要意义,其主人公丰太郎被视为经历了“现代自我”的“觉醒”与“挫折”的典型人物。以往研究大都将“挫折”归咎于丰太郎“性格软弱”,偏重于将其作为“认知主体”加以把握。本文从“认知自我”“、感性自我”“、道德自我”三个层面进行探讨,认为丰太郎的“软弱”是一种善感的天性,也是从感性出发的对主体性的追求。丰太郎以文学青年的姿态肯定“感性自我”,同时又以“士族”道德标准否定“感性自我”。而作为“认知主体”的自我,被裹挟于近代与反近代两种力量之间,陷入了深刻的危机。丰太郎多重自我之间的矛盾折射出明治社会价值观交汇冲突的复杂局面。
森鷗外所著《舞姬》在日本文學現代化轉型過程中具有重要意義,其主人公豐太郎被視為經歷瞭“現代自我”的“覺醒”與“挫摺”的典型人物。以往研究大都將“挫摺”歸咎于豐太郎“性格軟弱”,偏重于將其作為“認知主體”加以把握。本文從“認知自我”“、感性自我”“、道德自我”三箇層麵進行探討,認為豐太郎的“軟弱”是一種善感的天性,也是從感性齣髮的對主體性的追求。豐太郎以文學青年的姿態肯定“感性自我”,同時又以“士族”道德標準否定“感性自我”。而作為“認知主體”的自我,被裹挾于近代與反近代兩種力量之間,陷入瞭深刻的危機。豐太郎多重自我之間的矛盾摺射齣明治社會價值觀交彙遲突的複雜跼麵。
삼구외소저《무희》재일본문학현대화전형과정중구유중요의의,기주인공봉태랑피시위경력료“현대자아”적“각성”여“좌절”적전형인물。이왕연구대도장“좌절”귀구우봉태랑“성격연약”,편중우장기작위“인지주체”가이파악。본문종“인지자아”“、감성자아”“、도덕자아”삼개층면진행탐토,인위봉태랑적“연약”시일충선감적천성,야시종감성출발적대주체성적추구。봉태랑이문학청년적자태긍정“감성자아”,동시우이“사족”도덕표준부정“감성자아”。이작위“인지주체”적자아,피과협우근대여반근대량충역량지간,함입료심각적위궤。봉태랑다중자아지간적모순절사출명치사회개치관교회충돌적복잡국면。
Maihime, written by Mori Ogai, is of great significance in the transitional period to the modernization of Japanese literature. Toyotaro, the protagonist in Maihime, is considered to have undergone the experiences of“awakening”and“frustration”in the“modern ego”. Most of the previous studies of the story have attributed Toyotaro’s“frustration”to his weakness of character, emphasizing that he is a“cognitive subject”. However, having explored the three different egos of the main character, i.e.“cognitive ego”,“sensual ego”and“moral ego”, this article advocates that Toyotaro’s“weakness”is his sensitive nature and is a result of his pursuit of subjectivity based on sensibility. Toyotaro approves of his“sensual ego”from the viewpoint of a literary youth, while he disapproves of the“sensual ego”from the perspective of Shizoku ethical standard. The ego of“cognitive subjectivity”has faced deep crises, as it is beset with modern and anti-modern forces. Toyotaro’s multiple self-contradictions have reflected the complicated conflicts among the social values of the Meiji era.